Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRise, Marit By
dc.contributor.authorGrimstad, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorSolbjør, Marit
dc.contributor.authorSteinsbekk, Aslak
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T11:36:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T13:22:48Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T11:36:37Z
dc.date.available2015-09-17T13:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research 2011, 11(296)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/300592
dc.description.abstractBackground: Governments in several countries attempt to strengthen user participation through instructing health care organisations to plan and implement activities such as user representation in administrational boards, improved information to users, and more individual user participation in clinical work. The professionals are central in implementing initiatives to enhance user participation in organisations, but no controlled studies have been conducted on the effect on professionals from implementing institutional development plans. The objective was to investigate whether implementing a development plan intending to enhance user participation in a mental health hospital had any effect on the professionals’ knowledge, practice, or attitudes towards user participation. Methods: This was a non-randomized controlled study including professionals from three mental health hospitals in Central Norway. A development plan intended to enhance user participation was implemented in one of the hospitals as a part of a larger re-organizational process. The plan included i.e. establishing a patient education centre and a user office, purchasing of user expertise, appointing contact professionals for next of kin, and improving of the centre’s information and the professional culture. The professionals at the intervention hospital thus constituted the intervention group, while the professionals at two other hospitals participated as control group. All professionals were invited to answer the Consumer Participation Questionnaire (CPQ) and additional questions, focusing on knowledge, practice, and attitudes towards user participation, two times with a 16 months interval. Results: A total of 438 professionals participated (55% response rate). Comparing the changes in the intervention group with the changes in the control group revealed no statistically significant differences at a 0.05 level. The implementation of the development plan thus had no measurable effect on the professionals’ knowledge, practice, or attitudes at the intervention hospital, compared to the control hospitals. Conclusion: This is the first controlled study on the effect on professionals from implementing a development plan to enhance user participation in a mental health hospital. The plan had no effect on professionals’ knowledge, practice, or attitudes. This can be due to the quality of the development plan, the implementation process, and/or the suitability of the outcome measures.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.titleEffect of an institutional development plan for user participation on professionals' knowledge, practice, and attitudesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-09-11T11:36:37Z
dc.source.volume11nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue296nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-11-296
dc.identifier.cristin886352
dc.description.localcode© 2011 Rise et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel