Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCohen, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorBilsen, Johan
dc.contributor.authorMiccinesi, Guido
dc.contributor.authorLöfmark, Rurik
dc.contributor.authorAddington-Hall, Julia
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.contributor.authorNorup, Michael
dc.contributor.authorvan der Wal, Gerrit
dc.contributor.authorDeliens, Luc
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T12:06:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T08:49:35Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T12:06:18Z
dc.date.available2015-09-17T08:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health 2007, 7(283)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/300433
dc.description.abstractBackground: Systematic and reliable epidemiological information at population level, preferably cross-national, is needed for an adequate planning of (end-of-life) health care policies, e.g. concerning place of death, but is currently lacking. This study illustrates opportunities and weaknesses of death certificate data to provide such information on place of death and associated factors in nine European countries (seven entire countries and five regions). Methods: We investigated the possibility and modality of all partners in this international comparative study (BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, SE, UK) to negotiate a dataset containing all deaths of one year with their national/regional administration of mortality statistics, and analysed the availability of information about place of death as well as a number of clinical, socio-demographic, residential and healthcare system factors. Results: All countries negotiated a dataset, but rules, procedures, and cost price to get the data varied strongly between countries. In total, about 1.1 million deaths were included. For four of the nine countries not all desired categories for place of death were available. Most desired clinical and socio-demographic information was available, be it sometimes via linkages with other population databases. Healthcare system factors could be made available by linking existing healthcare statistics to the residence of the deceased. Conclusion: Death certificate data provide information on place of death and on possibly associated factors and confounders in all studied countries. Hence, death certificate data provide a unique opportunity for cross-national studying and monitoring of place of death. However, modifications of certain aspects of death certificate registration and rules of data-protection are perhaps required to make international monitoring of place of death more feasible and accurate.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.titleUsing death certificate data to study place of death in 9 European countries: opportunities and weaknessesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-09-11T12:06:18Z
dc.source.volume7nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Public Healthnb_NO
dc.source.issue283nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-7-283
dc.identifier.cristin367199
dc.description.localcode© 2007 Cohen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record