CPP or Not, That Is the Question: Physicians' Work With Activating CPPs
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Åpne
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995087Utgivelsesdato
2021Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Sammendrag
The Norwegian government has launched a policy titled cancer patient pathways (CPPs), which assigns maximum deadlines to the various phases of the diagnostic investigation. In this article, I examine the starting point of CPPs through the lens of institutional ethnography—that is, how physicians work with the referral of patients in the context of CPPs. Based on qualitative interviews with physicians in both primary and secondary care across Norway (N = 37), the findings reveal that the distinction between CPP or not is by no means clear-cut for either primary or specialist physicians. The starting point of CPPs is mediated by the interaction between physicians and patients and how the referral is composed, as well as how and by whom the referral is interpreted, in conjunction with overarching discourses, policies, and guidelines for practice. The findings challenge the notion that all potential cancer patients can and should be equally prioritized. CPP or Not, That Is the Question: Physicians' Work With Activating CPPs