Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSandbakk, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Thomas André
dc.contributor.authorEttema, Gerardus Johannes C
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-07T07:47:22Z
dc.date.available2022-04-07T07:47:22Z
dc.date.created2022-01-09T21:57:55Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP). 2021, 16 (4), 605-608.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2990379
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To provide novel insight regarding the influence of exercise modality on training load management by (1) providing a theoretical framework for the impact of physiological and biomechanical mechanisms associated with different exercise modalities on training load management in endurance exercise and (2) comparing effort-matched low-intensity training sessions performed by top-level athletes in endurance sports with similar energy demands. Practical Applications and Conclusions: The ability to perform endurance training with manageable muscular loads and low injury risks in different exercise modalities is influenced both by mechanical factors and by muscular state and coordination, which interrelate in optimizing power production while reducing friction and/or drag. Consequently, the choice of exercise modality in endurance training influences effort beyond commonly used external and internal load measurements and should be considered alongside duration, frequency, and intensity when managing training load. By comparing effort-matched low- to moderate-intensity sessions performed by top-level athletes in endurance sports, this study exemplifies how endurance exercise with varying modalities leads to different tolerable volumes. For example, the weight-bearing exercise and high-impact forces in long-distance running put high loads on muscles and tendons, leading to relatively low training volume tolerance. In speed skating, the flexed knee and hip position required for effective speed skating leads to occlusion of thighs and low volume tolerance. In contrast, the non-weight-bearing, low-contraction exercises in cycling or swimming allow for large volumes in the specific exercise modalities. Overall, these differences have major implications on training load management in sports.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_US
dc.titleThe influence of exercise modality on training load managementen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber605-608en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP)en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2021-0022
dc.identifier.cristin1977114
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel