Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKhoramipour, Kayvan
dc.contributor.authorSandbakk, Øyvind Bucher
dc.contributor.authorKeshteli, Ammar Hassanzadeh
dc.contributor.authorGaeini, Abbas Ali
dc.contributor.authorWishart, David S.
dc.contributor.authorChamari, Karim
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-18T07:40:23Z
dc.date.available2022-03-18T07:40:23Z
dc.date.created2021-11-24T12:21:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSports Medicine. 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0112-1642
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986012
dc.description.abstractBackground Metabolomics is a field of omics science that involves the comprehensive measurement of small metabolites in biological samples. It is increasingly being used to study exercise physiology and exercise-associated metabolism. However, the field of exercise metabolomics has not been extensively reviewed or assessed. Objective This review on exercise metabolomics has three aims: (1) to provide an introduction to the general workflow and the different metabolomics technologies used to conduct exercise metabolomics studies; (2) to provide a systematic overview of published exercise metabolomics studies and their findings; and (3) to discuss future perspectives in the field of exercise metabolomics. Methods We searched electronic databases including Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the SpringerLink academic journal database between January 1st 2000 and September 30th 2020. Results Based on our detailed analysis of the field, exercise metabolomics studies fall into five major categories: (1) exercise nutrition metabolism; (2) exercise metabolism; (3) sport metabolism; (4) clinical exercise metabolism; and (5) metabolome comparisons. Exercise metabolism is the most popular category. The most common biological samples used in exercise metabolomics studies are blood and urine. Only a small minority of exercise metabolomics studies employ targeted or quantitative techniques, while most studies used untargeted metabolomics techniques. In addition, mass spectrometry was the most commonly used platform in exercise metabolomics studies, identified in approximately 54% of all published studies. Our data indicate that biomarkers or biomarker panels were identified in 34% of published exercise metabolomics studies. Conclusion Overall, there is an increasing trend towards better designed, more clinical, mass spectrometry-based metabolomics studies involving larger numbers of participants/patients and larger numbers of metabolites being identified.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.titleMetabolomics in Exercise and Sports: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis is the authors' accepted manuscript to an article published by Springer. Locked until 30.10.2022 due to copyright restrictions.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.journalSports Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40279-021-01582-y
dc.identifier.cristin1958344
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel