Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMikalef, Patrik
dc.contributor.authorKourouthanassis, Panos
dc.contributor.authorPateli, Adamantia
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T09:30:56Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T09:30:56Z
dc.date.created2017-02-07T09:56:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1471-1834
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2983035
dc.description.abstractBackground Although doctors increasingly engage in online information seeking to complement their medical practice, little is known regarding what online information sources are used and how effective they are. Objective Grounded on self-determination and needs theory, this study posits that doctors tend to use online information sources to fulfil their information requirements in three pre-defined areas: patient care, knowledge development and research activities. Fulfilling these information needs is argued to improve doctors' perceived medical practice competence. Methods Performing PLS-SEM analysis on primary survey data from 303 medical doctors practicing in four major Greek hospitals, a conceptual model is empirically tested. Results Using authoritative online information sources was found to fulfil all types of information needs. Contrarily, using non-authoritative information sources had no significant effect. Satisfying information requirements relating to patient care and research activities enhanced doctors' perceptions about their medical practice competence. In contrast, meeting knowledge development information needs had the opposite result. Discussion Consistent with past studies, outcomes indicate that doctors tend to use non-authoritative online information sources; yet their use was found to have no significant value in fulfilling their information requirements. Conclusions Authoritative online information sources are found to improve perceived medical practice competence by satisfying doctors' diverse information requirements.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleOnline information search behaviour of physiciansen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions by the publisheren_US
dc.source.journalHealth Information and Libraries Journalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hir.12170
dc.identifier.cristin1447691
cristin.unitcode194,63,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for datateknikk og informasjonsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel