Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorD'Urso, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorWang, Geng
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Liang-Dar
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Gunn-Helen
dc.contributor.authorWarrington, Nicole Maree
dc.contributor.authorEvans, David M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T08:49:12Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T08:49:12Z
dc.date.created2021-01-14T21:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 2020, 1-6.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2040-1744
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2982311
dc.description.abstractRecent studies have used Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the observational association between low birth weight (BW) and increased risk of cardiometabolic outcomes, specifically cardiovascular disease, glycemic traits, and type 2 diabetes (T2D), and inform on the validity of the Barker hypothesis. We used simulations to assess the validity of these previous MR studies, and to determine whether a better formulated model can be used in this context. Genetic and phenotypic data were simulated under a model of no direct causal effect of offspring BW on cardiometabolic outcomes and no effect of maternal genotype on offspring cardiometabolic risk through intrauterine mechanisms; where the observational relationship between BW and cardiometabolic risk was driven entirely by horizontal genetic pleiotropy in the offspring (i.e. offspring genetic variants affecting both BW and cardiometabolic disease simultaneously rather than a mechanism consistent with the Barker hypothesis). We investigated the performance of four commonly used MR analysis methods (weighted allele score MR (WAS-MR), inverse variance weighted MR (IVW-MR), weighted median MR (WM-MR), and MR-Egger) and a new approach, which tests the association between maternal genotypes related to offspring BW and offspring cardiometabolic risk after conditioning on offspring genotype at the same loci. We caution against using traditional MR analyses, which do not take into account the relationship between maternal and offspring genotypes, to assess the validity of the Barker hypothesis, as results are biased in favor of a causal relationship. In contrast, we recommend the aforementioned conditional analysis framework utilizing maternal and offspring genotypes as a valid test of not only the Barker hypothesis, but also to investigate hypotheses relating to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease more broadly.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA cautionary note on using Mendelian randomization to examine the Barker hypothesis and Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-6en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Developmental Origins of Health and Diseaseen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S2040174420001105
dc.identifier.cristin1871656
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal