Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarrus, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorTiberio, Lorenza
dc.contributor.authorMastandrea, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorChokrai, Parissa
dc.contributor.authorFritsche, Immo
dc.contributor.authorKløckner, Christian
dc.contributor.authorMasson, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorVesely, Stepan
dc.contributor.authorPanno, Angelo
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T08:47:08Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T08:47:08Z
dc.date.created2021-12-14T12:10:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2981604
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how psychological processes drive human energy choices is an urgent, and yet relatively under-investigated, need for contemporary society. A knowledge gap still persists on the links between psychological factors identified in earlier studies and people's behaviors in the energy domain. This research applies a meta-analytical procedure to assess the strength of the associations between five different classes of individual variables (i.e.,: attitudes, intentions, values, awareness, and emotions) and energy-saving behavioral intentions and behaviors (self-reported and actual). Based on a systematic review of studies published between 2007 and 2017, we estimate the average effect size of predictor-criterion relations, and we assess relevant moderators and publication bias, drawing on data obtained from 102 independent samples reported in 67 published studies (N = 59.948). Results from a series of five single meta-analyses reveal a pattern of significant positive associations between the selected psychological determinants and energy-saving indicators: associations between individual-level predictors and energy-saving outcomes are positive and moderate in size, ranging from large effects for emotions to small-moderate effects for pro-environmental values. Interestingly, moderation analysis reveals, among other things, that attitude-behavior links are not statistically significant when actual behavior is considered as an outcome. Implications for policy interventions are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePsychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approachen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber18en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648221
dc.identifier.cristin1968321
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal