Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKumar, Binit
dc.contributor.authorKadia, Subhojit
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Zulfequar
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T11:42:54Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T11:42:54Z
dc.date.created2021-02-04T21:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Civil Engineering. 2021, 19 (9), 1043-1054.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-0522
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2977160
dc.description.abstractThe application of a piano key (PK) weir in a channel may lead to changes in the flow characteristics, upstream siltation conditions, and bed elevation. In this study, laboratory-based Type-A PK weir models with noses below the upstream apexes were studied under different flow and siltation conditions. A total of 342 datasets were collected from the three models. Upstream siltation had no impact on the discharge efficiency of submerged PK weirs, but under the free-flow condition, there was a maximum reduction of 4% in the coefficient of discharge. Planners and designers must consider such variations in channels with a high sediment load. However, at high H/P (where H is the head over the weir crest and P is the weir height), the siltation effect starts to decrease, possibly due to the alternation in the flow condition caused by tailwater submergence. The modular submergence was found to be approximately 0.5, which is close to the values available in the literature. The proposed equations for free-flowing PK weirs performed very well with a maximum error of approximately 7% and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of approximately 2.5%. Furthermore, approximately 60% of the data lie within the ± 3% error bands, and almost all data lie within the ± 6% error bands. The equations proposed for submerged PK weirs also efficiently estimated the coefficient of discharge with a maximum error ranging from 9.0 to 11.32% and an MAPE varying from 2.94 to 4.27%.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.titleDischarge Characteristics of Piano Key Weirs With and Without Upstream Siltationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis is the authors' accepted manuscript to an article published by Springer. Locked until DATO due to copyright restrictions.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1043-1054en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40999-021-00607-x
dc.identifier.cristin1886945
dc.description.localcodeThis is the authors' accepted manuscript to an article published by Springer. Locked until 15/3-2022 due to copyright restrictions.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel