Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilhelmsen, Øivind
dc.contributor.authorAasen, Ailo
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T12:51:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T12:51:09Z
dc.date.created2021-10-07T10:01:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2590-1400
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2827616
dc.description.abstractThe critical mass flow rate is the maximum flow rate that can pass through a constrained geometry such as a nozzle. For liquid CO2, it has been shown that homogeneous relaxation models systematically underpredict the critical mass flow rate. In this work, we demonstrate that a delay of the phase transition is necessary to reproduce experiments. To analyze this in further detail, two methodologies are presented: (1) the delayed homogeneous relaxation model (Delayed HRM), and (2) the metastable isentrope model (MIM). Delayed HRM is a relaxation model that can readily be incorporated into a spatially distributed description of the fluid flow, e.g. in ejectors. MIM assumes isentropic flow and instantaneous equilibrium up to the limit of metastability, and yields a geometry-independent critical mass flux as the solution of a set of algebraic equations. We compare the two methodologies to available experimental data on the critical mass flow rates of CO2 and H2O through nozzles, finding that they give nearly identical predictions. This suggests that the critical mass flow rate is mostly determined by the achievable degree of metastability before onset of phase change, and is rather insensitive to dynamic variables such as the depressurization rate or the rate of relaxation towards equilibrium. Using the limit of metastability predicted by homogeneous nucleation theory works well at high temperatures, rendering the methodologies completely predictive. They deviate on average 11% from experimental data on CO2, and thus outperform homogeneous relaxation models by a large margin, even when the latter employs several fitted parameters. Especially good agreement was found with experiments that employ a lubrication oil, which is hypothesized to suppress heterogeneous nucleation. The limit of superheat at lower temperatures must be described by heterogeneous nucleation theory. For water and CO2 we find a crossover between homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation at T590 K and T285 K respectively. Moreover, the predicted limit of superheat falls on a single curve in the temperature–pressure space of water, and we present an empirical correlation of this curve. By combining this expression with the above methodologies, we obtained an average deviation of 3% with available experimental data on H2O mass flow rates.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleChoked liquid flow in nozzles: crossover from heterogeneous to homogeneous cavitation and insensitivity to depressurization rateen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume248en_US
dc.source.journalChemical Engineering Science: Xen_US
dc.source.issuePart Ben_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ces.2021.117176
dc.identifier.cristin1944052
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/884213en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal