Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSommervoll, Dag Einar
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-22T11:25:34Z
dc.date.available2021-09-22T11:25:34Z
dc.date.created2020-08-19T12:44:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Housing Economics. 2020, 49 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-1377
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2780299
dc.description.abstractThe lion’s share of Norwegian homes changes hands through closely monitored and regulated auctions. Some housing market experts advocate the supremacy of a jump bid, a significant bid increase to discourage fellow bidders, and thereby acquire the dwelling at a lower price compared to bidding strategy with moderate bid increases. We find no evidence for the efficacy of this jump bid strategy. Jump bidders, if successful, pay a positive jump premium. This also applies to the case where the jump is not the final bid and the jump bidder win at a later stage. In this case, the jump bid premium is around 1 to 2%. However, a jump bid is a credible signal of “serious intentions”. Jump bidders tend to win auction more often even in cases, where the jump bid is matched, and the auction continues.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137720300498?via%3Dihub
dc.titleJump bids in real estate auctionsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis version of the article will not be available due to copyright restrictions by Elsevieren_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.volume49en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Housing Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhe.2020.101713
dc.identifier.cristin1824026
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel