Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorToscani, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorGuarnera, Dar'ya
dc.contributor.authorGuarnera, Giuseppe Claudio
dc.contributor.authorHardeberg, Jon Yngve
dc.contributor.authorGegenfurtner, Karl
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-31T11:25:01Z
dc.date.available2021-05-31T11:25:01Z
dc.date.created2020-09-01T16:40:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationACM Transactions on Applied Perception. 2020, 17 (2), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1544-3558
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2757055
dc.description.abstractPrevious research investigated the perceptual dimensionality of achromatic reflection of opaque surfaces, by using either simple analytic models of reflection or measured reflection properties of a limited sample of materials. Here, we aim to extend this work to a broader range of simulated materials. In a first experiment, we used sparse multidimensional scaling techniques to represent a set of rendered stimuli in a perceptual space that is consistent with participants’ similarity judgments. Participants were presented with one reference object and four comparisons, rendered with different material properties. They were asked to rank the comparisons according to their similarity to the reference, resulting in an efficient collection of a large number of similarity judgments. To interpret the space individuated by multidimensional scaling, we ran a second experiment in which observers were asked to rate our experimental stimuli according to a list of 30 adjectives referring to their surface reflectance properties. Our results suggest that perception of achromatic reflection is based on at least three dimensions, which we labelled “Lightness,” “Gloss,” and “Metallicity,” in accordance with the rating results. These dimensions are characterized by a relatively simple relationship with the parameters of the physically based rendering model used to generate our stimuli, indicating that they correspond to different physical properties of the rendered materials. Specifically, “Lightness” relates to diffuse reflections, “Gloss” to the presence of high contrast sharp specular highlights, and “Metallicity” to spread out specular reflections.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherACMen_US
dc.titleThree perceptual dimensions for specular and diffuse reflectionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber26en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.journalACM Transactions on Applied Perceptionen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3380741
dc.identifier.cristin1826573
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 250293en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 288670en_US
dc.description.localcode© ACM, 2020. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published here, DOI 10.1145/3380741en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel