Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNikolaisen, Even
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Richard
dc.contributor.authorFabian, Karl
dc.contributor.authorMcEnroe, Suzanne
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-10T10:51:41Z
dc.date.available2021-05-10T10:51:41Z
dc.date.created2021-01-17T12:38:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 2020, 21 (11), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-2027
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2754614
dc.description.abstractThree‐dimensional geometries of silicate‐hosted magnetic inclusions from the Harcus intrusion, South Australia have been determined using focused‐ion‐beam nanotomography (FIB‐nt). By developing an effective workflow, the geometries were reconstructed for magnetic particles in a plagioclase (162) and a pyroxene (282), respectively. For each inclusion, micromagnetic modeling using Micromagnetic Earth Related Rapid Interpreted Language Laboratory provided averaged hysteresis loops and backfield remanence curves of 20 equidistributed field directions together with average Ms, Mrs, Hc, and Hcr. The micromagnetic structures within each silicate are single‐domain (SD), single‐vortex (SV), multivortex (MV) and multidomain states. They have been analyzed using domain‐state diagnostic plots, such as the Day plot and the Néel plot. SD particles can be subdivided into groups with dominant uniaxial anisotropy (Mrs/Ms ∼0.5 and 10 < Hc < 100 mT) and mixed uniaxial/multiaxial anisotropy (Mrs/Ms ∼0.7 and 10 < Hc < 30 mT). Most SV particles lie on a trend with 0 < Mrs/Ms < 0.1 and 0 < Hc < 10 mT, while others display a broad range of intermediate Mrs/Ms and Hc values. SV and MV states do not plot on systematic grain‐size trends. Instead, the multicomponent mixture of domain states within each silicate spans the entire range of natural variability seen in bulk samples. This questions the interpretation of bulk average hysteresis parameters in terms of grain size alone. FIB‐nt combined with large‐scale micromagnetic simulations provides a more complete characterization of silicate‐hosted carriers of stable magnetic remanence. This approach will improve the understanding of single‐crystal paleomagnetism and enable primary paleomagnetic data to be extracted from ancient rocks.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union, AGUen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHysteresis of Natural Magnetite Ensembles: Micromagnetics of Silicate‐Hosted Magnetite Inclusions Based on Focused‐Ion‐Beam Nanotomographyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber20en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystemsen_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2020GC009389
dc.identifier.cristin1872638
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 295864en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 245963en_US
dc.description.localcode© 2020 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere2020GC009389en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal