Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe las Cuevas, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMundal, Ingunn Pernille
dc.contributor.authorBetancort, Moisés
dc.contributor.authorLara Cabrera, Mariela Loreto
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T10:14:19Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T10:14:19Z
dc.date.created2020-08-05T14:56:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2020, 20 (3), 262-270.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1697-2600
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2739879
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objective: CollaboRATE is a 3-item self-report measure of the patient experience of shared decision-making (SDM) process. The objective of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of CollaboRATE in community mental health care. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a Community Mental Health Center of the Canary Islands Health Service. Two hundred and fifty consecutive psychiatric outpatients were invited to participate. Of those, 191 accepted (76.40% of response rate) and completed the CollaboRATE, the Control Preferences Scale (CPS), and a form with sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: Exploratory factor analysis ratified the unidimensionality of the measure. High internal consistency was found (α Cronbach = .95, Guttman's λ = .93, and ω = .95). Strong positive correlations (p < .0001) were found between the CollaboRATE and the CPS. Only 39.80% of respondents gave the best possible score on CollaboRATE. Conclusions: This study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the CollaboRATE as a measure of SDM. The measure is quick to complete and feasible for use in outpatient mental health care. At present, a significative number of psychiatric outpatients are not involved in SDM. The use of this measure in psychiatric routine care can be a key tool in assessing and implementing SDM. Keywords: CollaboRATE measure, mental disorders, shared decision-making, instrumental studyen_US
dc.description.abstractAntecedentes/Objetivo: CollaboRATE es un autoinforme de tres ítems que permite al paciente valorar su experiencia en la toma de decisiones compartidas (TDC) sobre su tratamiento. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de CollaboRATE en la atención comunitaria de salud mental. Método: Se realizó un estudio transversal en una Unidad de Salud Mental del Servicio Canario de la Salud. Doscientos cincuenta pacientes psiquiátricos ambulatorios consecutivos fueron invitados a participar y 191 aceptaron (76,40%). Los pacientes completaron el CollaboRATE, la Escala de Preferencias de Control (EPC), y un formulario con variables sociodemográficas y clínicas. Resultados: El análisis factorial exploratorio ratificó la unidimensionalidad de la medida. Se encontró una alta consistencia interna (α Cronbach = 0,95; Guttman's λ = 0,93; y ω = 0,95). Se registraron significativas correlaciones positivas (p < 0,0001) entre CollaboRATE y el EPC. Solo el 39,80% de los encuestados dieron la mejor puntuación posible en CollaboRATE. Conclusiones: La versión en español de CollaboRATE es una medida fiable y válida de TDC, rápida de completar y factible para su uso en Psiquiatría comunitaria. En la actualidad, pocos pacientes psiquiátricos son involucrados en TDC. CollaboRATE puede ser una herramienta clave para evaluar e implementar la TDC en la atención psiquiátrica ambulatoria. Palabras clave: CollaboRATE, trastornos mentales, toma de decisiones compartidas, estudio instrumentalen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260020300478
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAssessment of shared decision-making in community mental health care : validation of the CollaboRATEen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluación de la toma de decisiones compartidas en la atención comunitaria de salud mental: validación de CollaboRATEen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber262-270en_US
dc.source.volume20en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Clinical and Health Psychologyen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.06.004
dc.identifier.cristin1821868
dc.description.localcode© 2020 Asociación Espanola ˜ de Psicología Conductual. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal