Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Kolbjørn Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Paul Andre
dc.contributor.authorBjørnsen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHelland, Christian
dc.contributor.authorRønnestad, Bent
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Thomas André
dc.contributor.authorØsterås, Sindre
dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Morten
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Gøran
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T08:21:21Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T08:21:21Z
dc.date.created2021-03-24T12:17:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2021, 16 (2), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735401
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability and agreement across methods for assessing individual force-velocity (FV) profiles of the lower limbs in athletes. Using a multicenter approach, 27 male athletes completed all measurements for the main analysis, with up to 82 male and female athletes on some measurements. The athletes were tested twice before and twice after a 2- to 6-month period of regular training and sport participation. The double testing sessions were separated by ~1 week. Individual FV-profiles were acquired from incremental loading protocols in squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) and leg press. A force plate, linear encoder and a flight time calculation method were used for measuring force and velocity during SJ and CMJ. A linear regression was fitted to the average force and velocity values for each individual test to extrapolate the FV-variables: theoretical maximal force (F0), velocity (V0), power (Pmax), and the slope of the FV-profile (SFV). Despite strong linearity (R2>0.95) for individual FV-profiles, the SFV was unreliable for all measurement methods assessed during vertical jumping (coefficient of variation (CV): 14–30%, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.36–0.79). Only the leg press exercise, of the four FV-variables, showed acceptable reliability (CV:3.7–8.3%, ICC:0.82–0.98). The agreement across methods for F0 and Pmax ranged from (Pearson r): 0.56–0.95, standard error of estimate (SEE%): 5.8–18.8, and for V0 and SFV r: -0.39–0.78, SEE%: 12.2–37.2. With a typical error of 1.5 cm (5–10% CV) in jump height, SFV and V0 cannot be accurately obtained, regardless of the measurement method, using a loading range corresponding to 40–70% of F0. Efforts should be made to either reduce the variation in jumping performance or to assess loads closer to the FV-intercepts. Coaches and researchers should be aware of the poor reliability of the FV-variables obtained from vertical jumping, and of the differences across measurement methods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOS, Public Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleForce-velocity profiling in athletes: Reliability and agreement across methodsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0245791
dc.identifier.cristin1900597
dc.description.localcodeCopyright: © 2021 Lindberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0245791en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal