Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLewandowski, Michal
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zhiyi
dc.contributor.authorParente, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorPozorski, Jacek
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T10:05:15Z
dc.date.available2021-03-08T10:05:15Z
dc.date.created2020-08-10T16:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationFuel. 2020, 278 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2732099
dc.description.abstractThe generalised Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) developed in the first part of this article is thoroughly validated against twelve flames from the Delft and Adelaide jet-in-hot-coflow (JHC) burners. These flames emulate Moderate or Intense Low Oxygen Dilution (MILD) conditions. Modelling of turbulence-chemistry interactions in this regime is a non trivial problem and many standard combustion models may fail. Recent Direct Numerical Simulation studies revealed a distributed appearance of the reaction zone indicating non-flamelet regime, which justified the use of reactor type modelling approaches. Those kind of models are of empirical nature and are sometimes criticized for being dependent on a number of tunable parameters. Also, most of new concepts are validated against a limited number of experiments. In this study, using the same modelling setup, twelve flames with different jet Reynolds number, level of oxidizer dilution with various fuel mixture were simulated. It turned out that the generalised EDC model considerably improved predictions with respect to the standard model for all the considered flames. Even though the predictions of the other EDC extensions provided better results in some regions, only the proposed generalised approach could cover the broad tange of operating conditions, proving its “universality” and reliabilityen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleGeneralised Eddy Dissipation Concept for MILD combustion regime at low local Reynolds and Damköhler numbers. Part 2: Validation of the modelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber16en_US
dc.source.volume278en_US
dc.source.journalFuelen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117773
dc.identifier.cristin1822581
dc.description.localcode0016-2361/ © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal