Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorIbrion, Mihaela
dc.contributor.authorPaltrinieri, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorRasekhi Nejad, Amir
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T09:16:40Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T09:16:40Z
dc.date.created2020-12-10T15:30:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationResults in Engineering (RINENG). 2020, 8 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2590-1230
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2729099
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates the successful survival of the Onagawa nuclear power station during and after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. As a research method, a system approach investigation and analysis— CAST (Causal Analysis based on Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Processes)—is applied over the life cycle of Onagawa. The main aim of this study is to identify how seismic and tsunami disaster risk reduction was implemented in different stages of the Onagawa nuclear power station’s life cycle. It is found that three safety cultures were built and developed over its life cycle: a nuclear safety culture, an earthquake safety culture, and a tsunami safety culture. These three safety cultures played important roles in the non-failure and success of Onagawa in 2011. Furthermore, the operator of Onagawa, Tohoku EPCo has a dynamic approach and a strong leadership towards earthquake and tsunami risk mitigation in all life cycle stages; flexibility and voluntary safety actions have been in place at Tohoku EPCo and Onagawa . Nevertheless, the 2011 events strongly influenced the decision to decommission the Onagawa Unit 1 early, brought to attention the length of the decommissioning process (which will surpass the operation stage), the high costs involved, and tremendous challenges linked to the permanent storage of radioactive waste. The successful survival of the Onagawa emphasizes that in order to achieve energy security through the nuclear energy in Japan and elsewhere in the world, safety always needs to come first. Furthermore, it supports dynamic learning not only for the nuclear industry, but also for the oil and gas and maritime industries; particularly, those situated in earthquake and tsunami risk areas.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleLearning from non-failure of Onagawa nuclear power station: an accident investigation over its life cycleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber20en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US
dc.source.journalResults in Engineering (RINENG)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100185
dc.identifier.cristin1858396
dc.description.localcodeThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber100185en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal