Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkauvold, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorEidsvik, Jo
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, Peter Jan
dc.contributor.authorAmezcua, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T08:18:59Z
dc.date.available2020-05-18T08:18:59Z
dc.date.created2019-07-08T19:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 2019, 145 (721), 1490-1502.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0035-9009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2654725
dc.description.abstractParticle filters are fully nonlinear data assimilation methods and as such are highly relevant. While the standard particle filter degenerates for high‐dimensional systems, recent developments have opened the way for new particle filters that can be used in such systems. The implicit equal‐weights particle filter (IEWPF) is an efficient approach that avoids filter degeneracy because it gives equal particle weights by construction. The method uses implicit sampling, whereby auxiliary vectors drawn from a proposal distribution undergo a transformation before they are added to each particle. In the original formulation of the IEWPF, the proposal distribution has a gap, causing all but one particle to have an inaccessible region in state space. We show that this leads to a systematic bias in the predictions and we modify the proposal distribution to eliminate the gap. We achieved this by using a two‐stage proposal method, where a single variance parameter is tuned to obtain adequate statistical coverage properties of the predictive distribution. We discuss the properties of the implicit mapping from an auxiliary random vector to the state vector, keeping in mind the aim of avoiding particle resampling. The revised filter is tested on linear and weakly nonlinear dynamical models in low‐dimensional and moderately high‐dimensional settings, demonstrating the success of the new methodology in removing the bias.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleA revised implicit equal-weights particle filteren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1490-1502en_US
dc.source.volume145en_US
dc.source.journalQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.source.issue721en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/qj.3506
dc.identifier.cristin1710710
dc.description.localcodeThis is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3506]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. "en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel