Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSvendsen, Torleiv
dc.contributor.authorBrodtkorb, Eylert
dc.contributor.authorBaftiu, Arton
dc.contributor.authorLossius, Morten
dc.contributor.authorNakken, Karl Otto
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Svein Ivar
dc.contributor.authorLandmark, Cecilie Johannessen
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T10:16:25Z
dc.date.available2020-04-02T10:16:25Z
dc.date.created2020-02-02T11:03:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationActa Neurologica Scandinavica. 2019, 00 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6314
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2650061
dc.description.abstractObjective Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with insufficient clinical experience in patients with intellectual disability (ID). They often have more severe epilepsy with comorbidities. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with refractory epilepsy with and without ID in a real‐life setting, taking drug monitoring (TDM) data into account therapeutic. Methods Retrospectively, we identified 344 patients using LCM from the TDM service covering the majority of the country, at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2013‐2018). Clinical and TDM data were available for 132 patients. Results Forty‐four of the 132 patients (33%) had ID. The retention rate was significantly higher in the ID vs the non‐ID group after 1 year (84% vs 68%, P < .05). By combining clinical and TDM data, we demonstrated that 37/38 responding patients had serum concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (>10 µmol/L), and 16/17 with lower concentrations were non‐responders. Mean serum concentration/dose ratios were similar in both groups, 0.06 and 0.07 µmol/L/mg. There were no significant differences regarding efficacy and tolerability. The risk of LCM withdrawal was significantly higher when LCM was added to sodium channel blockers, even if the latter was discontinued. Significance Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, where one third had ID, and in these patients the retention rate was higher. The combination of clinical and TDM data could possibly facilitate LCM therapy in these vulnerable patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleClinical experience combined with therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamideen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-8en_US
dc.source.volume00en_US
dc.source.journalActa Neurologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ane.13206
dc.identifier.cristin1789802
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions. (c) 2019 by Wiley.en_US
cristin.unitcode194,65,30,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for nevromedisin og bevegelsesvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel