Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSmåbrekke, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorBalteskard Rinde, Ludvig
dc.contributor.authorEvensen, Line Holtet
dc.contributor.authorMorelli, Vania Maris
dc.contributor.authorHveem, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorGabrielsen, Maiken Elvestad
dc.contributor.authorNjølstad, Inger
dc.contributor.authorMathiesen, Ellisiv B.
dc.contributor.authorRosendaal, Frits Richard
dc.contributor.authorBrækkan, Sigrid Kufaas
dc.contributor.authorHansen, John-Bjarne
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T11:56:44Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T11:56:44Z
dc.date.created2019-05-28T10:31:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2019, 1-9.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1538-7933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2637217
dc.description.abstractBackground Family history of myocardial infarction (FHMI) is known to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives To investigate the effect of prothrombotic genotypes on the association between FHMI and VTE in a case‐cohort recruited from a general population. Methods Cases with a first VTE (n = 1493) and a subcohort (n = 13 072) were sampled from the Tromsø study (1994‐2012) and the Nord‐Trøndelag health (HUNT) study (1995‐2008). The DNA samples were genotyped for rs8176719 (ABO), rs6025 (F5), rs1799963 (F2), rs2066865 (FGG), and rs2036914 (F11). Participants with missing information on risk alleles (n = 175), FHMI (n = 2769), and BMI (n = 52) were excluded. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for VTE. To explore the role of prothrombotic genotypes for the association between FHMI and VTE, we (a) included the genotypes in the multivariable‐adjusted models and (b) assessed the joint effects between FHMI and genotypes on VTE risk. Results The FHMI was associated with a 1.3‐fold increased risk of VTE (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.16‐1.50) and 1.5‐fold increased risk of unprovoked VTE (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22‐1.78). The risk of VTE by FHMI did not alter after adjustment for the five genotypes. The combination of FHMI and the different prothrombotic genotypes did not result in an excess VTE risk (i.e. no biological interaction). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the risk of VTE by FHMI is not explained by rs8176719 (ABO), rs6025 (F5), rs1799963 (F2), rs2066865 (FGG), and rs2036914 (F11). The combination of FHMI with prothrombotic genotypes had an additive effect on VTE risk.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleImpact of prothrombotic genotypes on the association between family history of myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolismnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-9nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasisnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jth.14493
dc.identifier.cristin1700766
dc.relation.projectStiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen: SKGJ-MED-015nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 248817nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 24.5.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14493]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,15
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie
cristin.unitnameHelseundersøkelsen i Nord-Trøndelag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel