Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJølle, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMidthjell, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorHolmen, Jostein
dc.contributor.authorCarlsen, Sven Magnus
dc.contributor.authorTuomilehto, Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorBjørngaard, Johan Håkon
dc.contributor.authorÅsvold, Bjørn Olav
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T09:06:22Z
dc.date.available2020-01-14T09:06:22Z
dc.date.created2020-01-13T11:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2052-4897
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2636103
dc.description.abstractObjective The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) is a recommended tool for type 2 diabetes prediction. There is a lack of studies examining the performance of the current 0–26 point FINDRISC scale. We examined the validity of FINDRISC in a contemporary Norwegian risk environment. Research design and methods We followed 47 804 participants without known diabetes and aged ≥20 years in the HUNT3 survey (2006–2008) by linkage to information on glucose-lowering drug dispensing in the Norwegian Prescription Database (2004–2016). We estimated the C-statistic, sensitivity and specificity of FINDRISC as predictor of incident diabetes, as indicated by incident use of glucose-lowering drugs. We estimated the 10-year cumulative diabetes incidence by categories of FINDRISC. Results The C-statistic (95% CI) of FINDRISC in predicting future diabetes was 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78). FINDRISC ≥15 (the conventional cut-off value) had a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 90%. The 10-year cumulative diabetes incidence (95% CI) was 4.0% (3.8% to 4.2%) in the entire study population, 13.5% (12.5% to 14.5%) for people with FINDRISC ≥15 and 2.8% (2.6% to 3.0%) for people with FINDRISC <15. Thus, FINDRISC ≥15 had a positive predictive value of 13.5% and a negative predictive value of 97.2% for diabetes within the next 10 years. To approach a similar sensitivity as in the study in which FINDRISC was developed, we would have to lower the cut-off value for elevated FINDRISC to ≥11. This would yield a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 67%, positive predictive value of 7.7% and negative predictive value of 98.5%. Conclusions The validity of FINDRISC and the risk of diabetes among people with FINDRISC ≥15 is substantially lower in the contemporary Norwegian population than assumed in official guidelines. To identify ~3/4 of those developing diabetes within the next 10 years, we would have to lower the threshold for elevated FINDRISC to ≥11, which would label ~1/3 of the entire adult population as having an elevated FINDRISC necessitating a glycemia assessment.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleValidity of the FINDRISC as a prediction tool for diabetes in a contemporary Norwegian population: a 10-year follow-up of the HUNT studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Carenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000769
dc.identifier.cristin1771214
dc.description.localcode© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,15
cristin.unitcode194,65,1,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,0
cristin.unitnameHelseundersøkelsen i Nord-Trøndelag
cristin.unitnameMH fakultetsadministrasjon
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal