Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJølle, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMidthjell, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorHolmen, Jostein
dc.contributor.authorCarlsen, Sven Magnus
dc.contributor.authorTuomilehto, Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorBjørngaard, Johan Håkon
dc.contributor.authorÅsvold, Bjørn Olav
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T09:06:22Z
dc.date.available2020-01-14T09:06:22Z
dc.date.created2020-01-13T11:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2052-4897
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2636103
dc.description.abstractObjective The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) is a recommended tool for type 2 diabetes prediction. There is a lack of studies examining the performance of the current 0–26 point FINDRISC scale. We examined the validity of FINDRISC in a contemporary Norwegian risk environment. Research design and methods We followed 47 804 participants without known diabetes and aged ≥20 years in the HUNT3 survey (2006–2008) by linkage to information on glucose-lowering drug dispensing in the Norwegian Prescription Database (2004–2016). We estimated the C-statistic, sensitivity and specificity of FINDRISC as predictor of incident diabetes, as indicated by incident use of glucose-lowering drugs. We estimated the 10-year cumulative diabetes incidence by categories of FINDRISC. Results The C-statistic (95% CI) of FINDRISC in predicting future diabetes was 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78). FINDRISC ≥15 (the conventional cut-off value) had a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 90%. The 10-year cumulative diabetes incidence (95% CI) was 4.0% (3.8% to 4.2%) in the entire study population, 13.5% (12.5% to 14.5%) for people with FINDRISC ≥15 and 2.8% (2.6% to 3.0%) for people with FINDRISC <15. Thus, FINDRISC ≥15 had a positive predictive value of 13.5% and a negative predictive value of 97.2% for diabetes within the next 10 years. To approach a similar sensitivity as in the study in which FINDRISC was developed, we would have to lower the cut-off value for elevated FINDRISC to ≥11. This would yield a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 67%, positive predictive value of 7.7% and negative predictive value of 98.5%. Conclusions The validity of FINDRISC and the risk of diabetes among people with FINDRISC ≥15 is substantially lower in the contemporary Norwegian population than assumed in official guidelines. To identify ~3/4 of those developing diabetes within the next 10 years, we would have to lower the threshold for elevated FINDRISC to ≥11, which would label ~1/3 of the entire adult population as having an elevated FINDRISC necessitating a glycemia assessment.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleValidity of the FINDRISC as a prediction tool for diabetes in a contemporary Norwegian population: a 10-year follow-up of the HUNT studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Carenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000769
dc.identifier.cristin1771214
dc.description.localcode© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,15
cristin.unitcode194,65,1,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,0
cristin.unitnameHelseundersøkelsen i Nord-Trøndelag
cristin.unitnameMH fakultetsadministrasjon
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal