Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMaterstvedt, Lars Johan
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-13T12:48:19Z
dc.date.available2019-12-13T12:48:19Z
dc.date.created2019-06-24T13:22:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Ethics. 2019, 1-2.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0306-6800
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2633229
dc.description.abstractThis article is a response to Thomas David Riisfeldt’s paper entitled ‘Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation’. It is shown that as far as euthanasia and palliative sedation are concerned, Riisfeldt has not established that a common ground, or a similarity, between the two is the relief of suffering. Quite the contrary, this is not characteristic of euthanasia, neither by definition nor from a clinical point of view. Hence, the argument hinges on a conceptually and empirically erroneous premise and is accordingly a non-starter.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2019/06/19/medethics-2019-105457.full
dc.titleDistinction between euthanasia and palliative sedation is clear-cutnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-2nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Medical Ethicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/medethics-2019-105457
dc.identifier.cristin1707248
dc.description.localcodeThis article has been accepted for publication following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105457nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,70,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for filosofi og religionsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel