Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMohammadi Bazargani, Mitra
dc.contributor.authorRohloff, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-05T10:16:02Z
dc.date.available2019-11-05T10:16:02Z
dc.date.created2015-09-26T19:38:10Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationFood Control. 2015, 61 156-164.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0956-7135
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2626569
dc.description.abstractBacterial biofilms pose health risks in clinical environments, food industry and drinking water systems. Here, we investigated in vitro antibiofilm activities of essential oils (EO) and plant extracts of peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.), coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.), and anise (Pimpinella anisum L.). Minimum inhibitory concentration assay (MIC) was carried out using two-fold serial dilution method and MTT assay against gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacteria. Biofilm growth and development were assessed using crystal violet (CV) and XTT reduction assays. Antibacterial activity was observed for almost all plant extracts and all EOs against both bacterial strains with stronger activity against S. aureus. All EOs (at MIC value of 0.08%-0.63%) and 8 out of 14 plant extracts (at MIC value of 2-4 mg/ml) inhibited bacteria cell attachment of both bacteria. CV and XTT reduction assay for the plant extracts and EOs with inhibition of bacteria attachment by at least 50%, demonstrated that coriander EO had the highest antibiofilm activity against biofilm formed by both tested bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli) at lowest MIC value 0.08% and 0.16% (v/v), respectively, indicating further investigations due to the oil’s high antibiofilm activity potential.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAntibiofilm activity of essential oils and plant extracts against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilmsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber156-164nb_NO
dc.source.volume61nb_NO
dc.source.journalFood Controlnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.036
dc.identifier.cristin1275595
dc.description.localcode© 2015. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,66,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for biologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal