Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Nanna
dc.contributor.authorHuffer, T
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Richard C.
dc.contributor.authorHassellöv, Martin
dc.contributor.authorVerschoor, Anja
dc.contributor.authorDaugaard, Anders E.
dc.contributor.authorRist, Sinja
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, Therese
dc.contributor.authorBrennholt, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorCole, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorHerrling, Maria P
dc.contributor.authorHess, Maren C
dc.contributor.authorIvleva, Natalia P
dc.contributor.authorLusher, Amy
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-29T08:04:21Z
dc.date.available2019-10-29T08:04:21Z
dc.date.created2019-04-16T16:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Technology. 2019, 53 (3), 1039-1047.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0013-936X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2624998
dc.description.abstractThe accumulation of plastic litter in natural environments is a global issue. Concerns over potential negative impacts on the economy, wildlife, and human health provide strong incentives for improving the sustainable use of plastics. Despite the many voices raised on the issue, we lack a consensus on how to define and categorize plastic debris. This is evident for microplastics, where inconsistent size classes are used and where the materials to be included are under debate. While this is inherent in an emerging research field, an ambiguous terminology results in confusion and miscommunication that may compromise progress in research and mitigation measures. Therefore, we need to be explicit on what exactly we consider plastic debris. Thus, we critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a unified terminology, propose a definition and categorization framework, and highlight areas of uncertainty. Going beyond size classes, our framework includes physicochemical properties (polymer composition, solid state, solubility) as defining criteria and size, shape, color, and origin as classifiers for categorization. Acknowledging the rapid evolution of our knowledge on plastic pollution, our framework will promote consensus building within the scientific and regulatory community based on a solid scientific foundation.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societynb_NO
dc.titleAre We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debrisnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1039-1047nb_NO
dc.source.volume53nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Science and Technologynb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.8b05297
dc.identifier.cristin1692975
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/660306nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 4.1.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Environmental Science and Technology, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05297nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,66,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for biologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel