Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCepuritis, Rolands
dc.contributor.authorSkare, Elisabeth Leite
dc.contributor.authorRamenskiy, Evgeny
dc.contributor.authorMørtsell, Ernst
dc.contributor.authorSmeplass, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorLi, Shizhao
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorSpangenberg, Jon
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T08:23:21Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T08:23:21Z
dc.date.created2019-05-25T13:26:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationConstruction and Building Materials. 2019, 218 333-340.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2600685
dc.description.abstractThe FlowCyl is a simple flow viscometer – a modification of the Marsh Cone test apparatus – developed to quantify the flow behaviour of cement pastes. The FlowCyl gives a one-parameter characterisation of rheology called the flow resistance ratio or λQ, which is defined as the average ratio between the flow loss of a measured fluid and theoretical flow of an ideal fluid. This paper reports a study on the limitations of the FlowCyl and appurtenant flow resistance ratio. The investigation includes rheological measurements of cement pastes incorporating crushed aggregate fines with a diameter below 125 µm and development of a numerical model in order to analyse the flow condition inside the FlowCyl. The numerical simulations are carried out both with the Bingham- and Herschel-Bulkley material model of the rheometer data. A comparison with the experimental λQ results illustrates that only a minor error is introduced when describing the flow of cement paste in the FlowCyl with a two-parameter model (Bingham material model) as compared to a three-parameter model (Hershel-Bulkley model). The results also show that the one-parameter characterisation (i.e. λQ) mainly correlates to the plastic viscosity in the Bingham material model, while the yield stress only correlates if the dosage of superplasticizer per mass of cement is kept constant. The numerical simulations show that high shear rates at the outlet of the FlowCyl are responsible for the difference in the correlations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAnalysing limitations of the FlowCyl as a one-point viscometer test for cement pastenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber333-340nb_NO
dc.source.volume218nb_NO
dc.source.journalConstruction and Building Materialsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.127
dc.identifier.cristin1700238
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 25 May 2021 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,45,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for konstruksjonsteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal