Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLejonberg, Eli
dc.contributor.authorElstad, Eyvind
dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Lise Vikan
dc.contributor.authorSolhaug, Trond
dc.contributor.authorChristophersen, Knut-Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-23T11:45:08Z
dc.date.available2019-04-23T11:45:08Z
dc.date.created2018-08-15T11:14:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. 2018, 7 (3), 261-279.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2046-6854
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2595057
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how different styles of mentoring in teacher education relate to mentor characteristics. Pre-service teachers often want practical advice. However, in Norway, school mentors have traditionally been encouraged to promote reflection rather than offering advice. This study seeks to explore the relationship between mentors’ support for reflection based and clear mentoring (a relatively direct approach to mentoring) and mentors’ self-efficacy and effort. Design/methodology/approach Using structural equation modelling of cross-sectional survey data (from 272 school mentors), the researchers in this study tested empirical interrelations between reflection-based mentoring, clear mentoring, mentor efficacy and effort. Clear mentoring was a reasonably consistent construct, while refection-based mentoring was a more elusive concept. Findings Effort was associated with support for reflection, while self-efficacy was moderately related to clear mentoring and reflection-based mentoring. The results illustrate that reflection-based methods are demanding for mentors. If direct approaches are more effective, additional evidence would be required to support mentor training that heavily emphasises reflection. Research limitations/implications Longitudinal and quasi-experimental studies are needed to support inferences about causality. Variable omission may have influenced the models. More research is needed to better understand the concept of reflection-based mentoring. Originality/value This paper contributes to the mentoring field by examining mentors’ preference for reflection based and clear mentoring and how such preferences are related to self-efficacy and effort. It also contributes to general and theoretical discussions about the relationships between beliefs about mentoring and mentor characteristics.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEmeraldnb_NO
dc.titleMentors of preservice teachers: The relationships between mentoring approach, self-efficacy and effortnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber261-279nb_NO
dc.source.volume7nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Educationnb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJMCE-12-2017-0076
dc.identifier.cristin1602156
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2017-0076nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,80,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for lærerutdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel