Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBungum, Berit
dc.contributor.authorBøe, Maria Vetleseter
dc.contributor.authorHenriksen, Ellen Karoline
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-16T07:16:35Z
dc.date.available2019-04-16T07:16:35Z
dc.date.created2018-04-21T21:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationScience Education. 2018, 102 (4), 856-877.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0036-8326
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2594723
dc.description.abstractQuantum physics challenges our views of the physical world anddescribes phenomena that cannot be directly observed. The useof language is hence essential in the teaching of quantum physics.With a sociocultural view of learning, we investigate characteristicsof preuniversity students’ small-group discussions and their poten-tial for enhancing understanding of quantum physics. The empiricaldata are 96 small-group discussions about two fundamental dilem-mas: whether light can be both waves and particles, and whetherthe cat in Schrödinger's thought experiment can be considered tobe both dead and alive. The discussions were analyzed by means ofa framework of four categories, grouped as productive and nonpro-ductive for learning, where “productive” means that students buildconstructively on each other's utterances and take the peers’ ideasinto account. Results show that a total of 70% of the discussions wereproductive, indicating that small-group discussions have a potentialfor enhancing understanding in quantum physics. This potential isconstituted by leading students to (i) articulate conceptual difficul-ties, (ii) deepen their understanding through exchange of views, and(iii) formulate new questions. The paper concludes with a discussionon how the learning potential of small-group discussions may be real-ized by combining dialogic and authoritative approaches.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleQuantum Talk: How small-group discussions may enhance students’ understanding in quantum physicsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber856-877nb_NO
dc.source.volume102nb_NO
dc.source.journalScience Educationnb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sce.21447
dc.identifier.cristin1580824
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 246723nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 14.05.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at 10.1002/sce.21447. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,80,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for lærerutdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel