Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDyrendal, Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorKennair, Leif Edward Ottesen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, James R
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T08:16:49Z
dc.date.available2019-03-13T08:16:49Z
dc.date.created2018-07-12T10:24:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal for the Study of New Religions. 2018, 8 (1), 73-97.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2041-9511
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2589782
dc.description.abstractRecent studies on conspiracy thinking has concluded that the strongest predictor of the tendency towards conspiratorial thinking is a one-dimensional construct-conspiracy mentality-that is relatively stable over time and valid across cultures. Lantian et al. (2016) found that a single, elaborate question can work as a measure of conspiracy beliefs. We assess the validity of this question for an untypical, religious group: self-identified Neopagans. We also test some recent findings on the relation between conspiracy thinking and paranormal beliefs, attitudes towards group equality, political identification, age, gender, and education. The general patterns hold up well in our investigation, but there was a clear distinction between conspiracy theories about powerful actors and those about minorities. The single-item measure was the largest predictor of the former kind of conspiracy belief followed by level of paranormal beliefs. Anti-egalitarianism and holding a right-wing political identity were the strongest predictors of conspiracy beliefs about minorities. Education was negatively related to conspiracy beliefs of all kinds.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEquinox Publishingnb_NO
dc.titleThe Role of Conspiracy Mentality and Paranormal Beliefs in Predicting Conspiracy Beliefs Among Neopagansnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeThe Role of Conspiracy Mentality and Paranormal Beliefs in Predicting Conspiracy Beliefs Among Neopagansnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber73-97nb_NO
dc.source.volume8nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal for the Study of New Religionsnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1558/ijsnr.36716
dc.identifier.cristin1596843
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 27.7.2020 due to copyright restrictions.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,70,0
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for filosofi og religionsvitenskap
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel