Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEngelsdorf, Timo
dc.contributor.authorGigli, Nora
dc.contributor.authorVeerabagu, Manikandan
dc.contributor.authorMcKenna, Joseph F.
dc.contributor.authorVaahtera, Lauri
dc.contributor.authorAugstein, Frauke
dc.contributor.authorvan der Does, Dieuwertje
dc.contributor.authorZipfel, Cyril
dc.contributor.authorHamann, Thorsten
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-01T11:06:24Z
dc.date.available2019-03-01T11:06:24Z
dc.date.created2018-08-03T15:40:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1937-9145
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2588228
dc.description.abstractCell walls surround all plant cells, and their composition and structure are modified in a tightly controlled, adaptive manner to meet sometimes opposing functional requirements during growth and development. The plant cell wall integrity (CWI) maintenance mechanism controls these functional modifications, as well as responses to cell wall damage (CWD). We investigated how the CWI system mediates responses to CWD in Arabidopsis thaliana. CWD induced by cell wall–degrading enzymes or an inhibitor of cellulose biosynthesis elicited similar, turgor-sensitive stress responses. Phenotypic clustering with 27 genotypes identified a core group of receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and ion channels required for the activation of CWD responses. A genetic analysis showed that the RLK FEI2 and the plasma membrane–localized mechanosensitive Ca2+ channel MCA1 functioned downstream of the RLK THE1 in CWD perception. In contrast, pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) signaling components, including the receptors for plant elicitor peptides (AtPeps) PEPR1 and PEPR2, repressed responses to CWD. CWD induced the expression of PROPEP1 and PROPEP3, which encode the precursors of AtPep1 and AtPep3, and the release of PROPEP3 into the growth medium. Application of AtPep1 and AtPep3 repressed CWD-induced phytohormone accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner. These results suggest that AtPep-mediated signaling suppresses CWD-induced defense responses controlled by the CWI mechanism. This suppression was alleviated when PTI signaling downstream of PEPR1 and PEPR2 was impaired. Defense responses controlled by the CWI maintenance mechanism might thus compensate to some extent for the loss of PTI signaling elements.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherAmerican Association for the Advancement of Sciencenb_NO
dc.titleThe plant cell wall integrity maintenance and immune signaling systems cooperate to control stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliananb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume11nb_NO
dc.source.journalScience Signalingnb_NO
dc.source.issue536nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1126/scisignal.aao3070
dc.identifier.cristin1599698
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aao3070nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,66,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for biologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel