Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWood, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorStadler, Konstantin
dc.contributor.authorIvanova, Diana
dc.contributor.authorSteen-Olsen, Kjartan
dc.contributor.authorTisserant, Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorHertwich, Edgar G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T10:15:13Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T10:15:13Z
dc.date.created2017-11-30T12:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Industrial Ecology. 2018, 22 (3), 540-552.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1088-1980
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2586169
dc.description.abstractCarbon footprints aim to engage consumers in contributing to climate‐change mitigation. Consumption‐oriented policy measures attempt to cause voluntary or incentivized interventions that reduce environmental impact through the supply chain by utilizing demand drivers. A large body of life cycle assessment studies describe how specific actions can reduce the environmental footprint of an individual or household. However, these assessments are often conducted with a narrow focus on particular goods and processes. Here, we formalize a counterfactual method and operational tool for scoping the potential impact of such actions, focusing on economy‐wide impact. This “quickscan” tool can model shifts and reductions in demand, rebound effects (using marginal expenditure), changes in domestic and international production recipes, and reductions in the environmental intensity of production. This tool provides quick, macro‐level estimates of the efficacy of consumer‐oriented policy measures and can help to prioritize relevant policies. We demonstrate the method using two case studies on diet and clothing using the EXIOBASE3 multiregional input‐output database, giving spatially explicit information on where environmental impact reductions of the interventions occur, and where impacts may increase in the case of rebounds.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jiec.12702
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePrioritizing Consumption-Based Carbon Policy Based on the Evaluation of Mitigation Potential Using Input-Output Methodsnb_NO
dc.title.alternativePrioritizing Consumption-Based Carbon Policy Based on the Evaluation of Mitigation Potential Using Input-Output Methodsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber540-552nb_NO
dc.source.volume22nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Industrial Ecologynb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jiec.12702
dc.identifier.cristin1520819
dc.description.localcode© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Industrial Ecology, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of Yale University. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal