Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorShefferson, Richard P.
dc.contributor.authorKull, Tiiu
dc.contributor.authorHutchings, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorSelosse, Marc-André
dc.contributor.authorJacquemyn, Hans
dc.contributor.authorKellett, Kimberly M.
dc.contributor.authorMenges, Eric S.
dc.contributor.authorPrimack, Richard B.
dc.contributor.authorTuomi, Juha
dc.contributor.authorAlahuhta, Kirsi
dc.contributor.authorHurskainen, Sonja
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Helen M.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Derek S.
dc.contributor.authorBrys, Rein
dc.contributor.authorBrzosko, Emilia
dc.contributor.authorDostálik, Slavomir
dc.contributor.authorGregg, Katharine
dc.contributor.authorIpser, Zdenek
dc.contributor.authorJäkäläniemi, Anne
dc.contributor.authorJersáková, Jana
dc.contributor.authorKettle, W. Dean
dc.contributor.authorMcCormick, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, Ana
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Michael T.
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorØien, Dag-Inge
dc.contributor.authorPüttsepp, Ülle
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Mélanie
dc.contributor.authorSather, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorSletvold, Nina
dc.contributor.authorStípková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorTali, Kadri
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Robert J. II
dc.contributor.authorWhigham, Dennis F.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T09:09:29Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T09:09:29Z
dc.date.created2018-11-08T20:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEcology Letters. 2018, 21 724-733.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1461-023X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2584945
dc.description.abstractVegetative dormancy, that is the temporary absence of aboveground growth for ≥ 1 year, is paradoxical, because plants cannot photosynthesise or flower during dormant periods. We test ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for its widespread persistence. We show that dormancy has evolved numerous times. Most species displaying dormancy exhibit life‐history costs of sprouting, and of dormancy. Short‐lived and mycoheterotrophic species have higher proportions of dormant plants than long‐lived species and species with other nutritional modes. Foliage loss is associated with higher future dormancy levels, suggesting that carbon limitation promotes dormancy. Maximum dormancy duration is shorter under higher precipitation and at higher latitudes, the latter suggesting an important role for competition or herbivory. Study length affects estimates of some demographic parameters. Our results identify life historical and environmental drivers of dormancy. We also highlight the evolutionary importance of the little understood costs of sprouting and growth, latitudinal stress gradients and mixed nutritional modes.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleDrivers of vegetative dormancy across herbaceous perennial plant speciesnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeDrivers of vegetative dormancy across herbaceous perennial plant speciesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber724-733nb_NO
dc.source.volume21nb_NO
dc.source.journalEcology Lettersnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ele.12940
dc.identifier.cristin1628517
dc.description.localcodeThis is the pre-peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12940]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,31,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for naturhistorie
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel