Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOttesen, Stig Ødegaard
dc.contributor.authorTomasgard, Asgeir
dc.contributor.authorFleten, Stein-Erik
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-07T08:28:38Z
dc.date.available2019-02-07T08:28:38Z
dc.date.created2018-09-19T11:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEnergy. 2018, 149 120-134.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2584243
dc.description.abstractDue to the electricity systems’ increasing need for flexibility, demand side flexibility aggregation becomes more important. An issue is how to make such activities profitable, which may be obtained by selling flexibility in multiple markets. A challenge is to allocate volumes to the different markets in an optimal way, which motivates the need for advanced decision support models. In this paper, we propose a methodology for optimal bidding for a flexibility aggregator participating in three sequential markets. We demonstrate the approach in a generalized market design that includes an options market for flexibility reservation, a spot market for day-ahead or shorter and a flexibility market for near real-time dispatch. Since the bidding decisions are made sequentially and the price information is gradually revealed, we formulate the decision models as multi-stage stochastic programs and generate scenarios for the possible realizations of prices. We illustrate the application of the models in a realistic case study in cooperation with four industrial companies and one aggregator. We quantify and discuss the value of flexibility and find that our proposed models are able to capture most of the potential value, except for some extreme cases. The value of aggregation is quantified to 3%.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no
dc.titleMulti market bidding strategies for demand side flexibility aggregators in electricity marketsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber120-134nb_NO
dc.source.volume149nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.187
dc.identifier.cristin1610954
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 209697nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/646476nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 17.02.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,60,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for industriell økonomi og teknologiledelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal