Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBibault, Jean-Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Pierfrancesco
dc.contributor.authorvan Elmpt, Wouter
dc.contributor.authorThorwarth, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Maximilian P
dc.contributor.authorRouschop, Kasper M
dc.contributor.authorSpalek, Mateusz
dc.contributor.authorMullaney, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRedalen, Kathrine
dc.contributor.authorDubois, Ludwig
dc.contributor.authorVerfaille, Christine
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Jesper Grau
dc.identifier.citationClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology. 2018, 9 61-67.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Radiotherapy education can be very different across Europe, despite the publication of the ESTRO core curricula in 2011. The purpose of the current study is to map the different RO European education systems, to report their perceived quality and to understand what could be improved to better teach RO. Methods An online survey consisting of 30 questions was sent to RO professionals under 40 years of age via email and social media. Clinicians, radiobiologists, physicists and radiation therapists (RTTs) were invited to answer questions regarding (1) demographics data, (2) duration, (3) organization, (4) content, (5) quality and potential improvements of national education programs. Results Four hundred and sixty three questionnaires were received from 34 European countries. All disciplines were represented: 45% clinicians (n = 210), 29% physicists (n = 135), 24% RTTs (n = 108) and 2% radiobiologists (n = 10). Male and female participants were well-balanced in each speciality, except for radiobiologists (80% males). Median age was 31.5 years old (range 21–40). A large range of the duration of the National RO education programs was observed: median = 9 years (range: 3–15). In half of the surveyed countries the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS), that facilitates mobility for trainees, has been implemented. Participants declared only a minority of countries have implemented the ESTRO Core Curriculum (n = 5). A quarter of participants indicated that their national education program is insufficient. Conclusion This is the first study to examine the different RO education systems in Europe. Large differences in organization and duration of national education programs have been found, along with perceived quality across Europe within each speciality. These results show the necessity of a discussion on how to move forward in this diversity of education programs and the potential contribution that the ESTRO may fulfil.nb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleLearning radiation oncology in Europe: Results of the ESTRO multidisciplinary surveynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalClinical and Translational Radiation Oncologynb_NO
dc.description.localcodeThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for fysikk

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal