Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTan, Jesus Reignard Medel
dc.contributor.authorEileraas, Kristoffer
dc.contributor.authorOpkvitne, Ola
dc.contributor.authorZirgulis, Giedrius
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, Max
dc.contributor.authorGeiker, Mette Rica
dc.contributor.authorBrekke, Dan-Evert
dc.contributor.authorKanstad, Terje
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-12T09:15:42Z
dc.date.available2018-12-12T09:15:42Z
dc.date.created2018-07-05T07:54:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationStructural Concrete. 2018, 19 (5), 1436-1447.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1464-4177
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2577297
dc.description.abstractThis paper theoretically and experimentally investigates the semi-empirical formulas recommended by Eurocode 2 (EC2), fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010), and Eurocode 2 with the German National Annex (DIN) for calculating crack widths in reinforced concrete. It is shown that the formulas can be derived from the principles for the idealized behavior of RC ties. However, instead of explicitly solving the resulting differential equations, the use of simplifications leads to inconsistent formulas. An experimental study was carried out involving the testing of eight RC ties to discover the modeling uncertainty of the formulas. It was found that EC2 substantially overestimated the crack widths for the RC ties. MC2010 and DIN seemed to predict the crack widths better, but gave rather a large number of nonconservative crack width predictions. These experimental results, combined with the theoretical study, suggest that a more consistent calculation model should be formulated by explicitly solving the resulting differential equation.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleExperimental and theoretical investigation of crack width calculation methods for RC tiesnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeExperimental and theoretical investigation of crack width calculation methods for RC tiesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1436-1447nb_NO
dc.source.volume19nb_NO
dc.source.journalStructural Concretenb_NO
dc.source.issue5nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/suco.201700237
dc.identifier.cristin1595752
dc.relation.projectStatens Vegvesen: 25135401nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 4.7.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700237]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,45,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for konstruksjonsteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel