Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGopalakrishnan, Shyam
dc.contributor.authorSamaniego Castruita, José Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorSinding, Mikkel Holger Strander
dc.contributor.authorKuderna, Lukas FK
dc.contributor.authorRäikkönen, Jannikke
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Bent
dc.contributor.authorSicheritz-Ponten, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLarson, Greger
dc.contributor.authorOrlando, Ludovic
dc.contributor.authorMarques-Bonet, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Anders J.
dc.contributor.authorDalén, Love
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Marcus Thomas Pius
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-28T08:19:19Z
dc.date.available2018-06-28T08:19:19Z
dc.date.created2017-10-24T13:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBMC Genomics. 2017, 18.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1471-2164
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2503478
dc.description.abstractBackground: An increasing number of studies are addressing the evolutionary genomics of dog domestication, principally through resequencing dog, wolf and related canid genomes. There is, however, only one de novo assembled canid genome currently available against which to map such data - that of a boxer dog (Canis lupus familiaris). We generated the first de novo wolf genome (Canis lupus lupus) as an additional choice of reference, and explored what implications may arise when previously published dog and wolf resequencing data are remapped to this reference. Results: Reassuringly, we find that regardless of the reference genome choice, most evolutionary genomic analyses yield qualitatively similar results, including those exploring the structure between the wolves and dogs using admixture and principal component analysis. However, we do observe differences in the genomic coverage of re-mapped samples, the number of variants discovered, and heterozygosity estimates of the samples. Conclusion: In conclusion, the choice of reference is dictated by the aims of the study being undertaken; if the study focuses on the differences between the different dog breeds or the fine structure among dogs, then using the boxer reference genome is appropriate, but if the aim of the study is to look at the variation within wolves and their relationships to dogs, then there are clear benefits to using the de novo assembled wolf reference genome.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringer Nature/ BioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe wolf reference genome sequence (Canis lupus lupus) and its implications for Canis spp. population genomicsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber11nb_NO
dc.source.volume18nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Genomicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12864-017-3883-3
dc.identifier.cristin1507234
dc.description.localcode© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,31,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for naturhistorie
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal