Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBalaj, Mirza
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, Courtney L.
dc.contributor.authorEikemo, Terje Andreas
dc.contributor.authorBambra, Clare
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Katie H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T08:26:56Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T08:26:56Z
dc.date.created2017-03-03T11:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Public Health. 2017, 27 107-114.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1101-1262
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2489026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Social gradients have been found across European populations, where less affluent groups are more often affected by poor housing and neighbourhood conditions. While poor housing and neighbourhood quality have been associated with a range of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), these conditions have rarely been applied to the examination of socioeconomic differences in NCDs. This study therefore asks ‘to what extent does adjusting for poor housing and neighbourhood conditions reduce inequalities in NCDs among men and women in Europe’? Methods: Our analysis used pooled-data from 20 European countries for women (n= 12 794) and men (n= 11 974), aged 25–75, from round 7 of the European Social Survey. Fourteen NCDs were investigated: heart/circulatory problems, high blood pressure, back pain, arm/hand pain, foot/leg pain, allergies, breathing problems, stomach/digestion problems, skin conditions, diabetes, severe headaches, cancer, obesity and depression. We used binary logistic regression models, stratified by gender, and adjusted rate ratios to examine whether educational inequalities in NCDs were reduced after controlling for poor housing and neighbourhood quality. Results: Overall, we find that adjusting for poor housing and neighbourhood quality reduces inequalities in NCDs. While reductions were relatively small for some NCDs–for high blood pressure, reductions were found in the range of 0–4.27% among women—for other conditions reductions were more considerable. Controlling for both housing and neighbourhood conditions for example, reduced inequalities by 16–24% for severe headaches and 14–30% for breathing problems. Conclusions: Social gradients in poor housing and neighbourhood quality could be an important contributor to educational inequalities in some NCDs.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)nb_NO
dc.titleThe social determinants of inequalities in self-reported health in Europe: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of healthnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber107-114nb_NO
dc.source.volume27nb_NO
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Public Healthnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckw224
dc.identifier.cristin1455596
dc.description.localcodeThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [European Journal of Public Health] following peer review. The version of record is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/27/suppl_1/102/3045945nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel