Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaberle, Inge
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Nils Erland L
dc.contributor.authorSkreiberg, Øyvind
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-02T08:25:35Z
dc.date.available2018-02-02T08:25:35Z
dc.date.created2017-08-27T16:24:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Procedia. 2017, 142 37-42-?.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2482306
dc.description.abstractIn this work, the drying and devolatilization of a thermally thick wood particle were modeled. The work was validated against experiments and good agreement was found. The work compared the numerical efficiency and accuracy of the thermal drying model and the kinetic rate drying model. The thermal drying model was used with a fixed boiling temperature (373 K). The kinetic data for the kinetic rate drying model was taken from an earlier work by Di Blasi [1] and additionally one set of kinetic data that was also tested, was assumed by the authors, with the main purpose of reducing the stiffness of the evaporation equation. The numerical efficiency was compared by comparing the CPU times associated with the different drying models. It was found that the thermal drying model is the most efficient drying model at both high and low moisture contents. Soft drying kinetics resulted in intermediate CPU times, while very stiff kinetics yielded the lowest numerical efficiency. No trend was observed regarding how CPU times of the different drying models behave with respect to increasing or decreasing moisture contents.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of numerical efficiency of the thermal and the kinetic rate drying model applied to a thermally thick wood particlenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber37-42-?nb_NO
dc.source.volume142nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergy Procedianb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.007
dc.identifier.cristin1488866
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 243752nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal