Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiangping
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Bhawna
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xuezhong
dc.contributor.authorGundersen, Truls
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Liyuan
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Suojiang
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-30T13:56:38Z
dc.date.available2018-01-30T13:56:38Z
dc.date.created2014-07-18T13:39:04Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2014, 27 289-298.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2480740
dc.description.abstractAn integrated framework focusing on the energetic analysis and environmental impacts of a CO2 capture and storage (CCS) system is presented, in which the process simulation method and the life cycle assessment (LCA) method are integrated and applied to the CCS value chain. Three scenarios for carbon capture from post-combustion power plant – an MEA-based system, a gas separation membrane process and a hybrid membrane-cryogenic process are studied. The energy efficiency of power plant and the specific capture energy consumption for each scenario are estimated from process simulation. The environmental impacts for each scenario and the base case without CCS are assessed with LCA method. The results show that the MEA-based capture system faces the challenges of higher energy consumption, and higher environmental impact caused by solvent degradation and emissions compared to gas membrane separation processes. The hybrid membrane-cryogenic process shows a better environmental potential for CO2 capture from flue gases due to much lower power consumption and relatively lower environmental impacts.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePost-combustion carbon capture technologies: Energetic analysis and life cycle assessmentnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber289-298nb_NO
dc.source.volume27nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.016
dc.identifier.cristin1143885
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 193816nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2014. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitcode194,66,30,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal