Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMiao, Chenglin
dc.contributor.authorCao, Qichen
dc.contributor.authorIto, Hiroshi
dc.contributor.authorYamahachi, Homare
dc.contributor.authorWitter, Menno
dc.contributor.authorMoser, May-Britt
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Edvard Ingjald
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-05T09:22:38Z
dc.date.available2018-01-05T09:22:38Z
dc.date.created2016-02-24T18:35:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationNeuron. 2015, 88 (3), 590-603.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0896-6273
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475892
dc.description.abstractHippocampal place cells undergo remapping when the environment is changed. The mechanism of hippocampal remapping remains elusive but spatially modulated cells in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) have been identified as a possible contributor. Using pharmacogenetic and optogenetic approaches, we tested the role of MEC cells by examining in mice whether partial inactivation in MEC shifts hippocampal activity to a different subset of place cells with different receptive fields. The pharmacologically selective designer Gi-protein-coupled muscarinic receptor hM4D or the light-responsive microbial proton pump archaerhodopsin (ArchT) was expressed in MEC, and place cells were recorded after application of the inert ligand clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) or light at appropriate wavelengths. CNO or light caused partial inactivation of the MEC. The inactivation was followed by substantial remapping in the hippocampus, without disruption of the spatial firing properties of individual neurons. The results point to MEC input as an element of the mechanism for remapping in place cells.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHippocampal Remapping after Partial Inactivation of the Medial Entorhinal Cortexnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber590-603nb_NO
dc.source.volume88nb_NO
dc.source.journalNeuronnb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.051
dc.identifier.cristin1339889
dc.relation.projectAndre: the Louis Jeantet Prize,nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: grant number 145993nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEU/ENSEMBLE’’–grant agreement no. 268598;nb_NO
dc.relation.projectAndre: Centre for Neural Computation, 223262nb_NO
dc.relation.projectAndre: the Ko¨rber Prize,nb_NO
dc.relation.projectAndre: the Kavli Foundationnb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: grant no. 214164nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEU/grant agreement 600725nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeCopyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is the authors' accepted and reviewed version of the manuscript for the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,60,0
cristin.unitnameKavliinstitutt for nevrovitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal