Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Elena
dc.contributor.authorNanos, Emmanouil
dc.contributor.authorSeyr, Helene
dc.contributor.authorValldecabres, Laura
dc.contributor.authorYürüsen, Nurseda
dc.contributor.authorSmolka, Ursula
dc.contributor.authorMuskulus, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMelero, Julio
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-20T08:50:58Z
dc.date.available2017-12-20T08:50:58Z
dc.date.created2017-12-19T11:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Procedia. 2017, 137 559-570.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2473165
dc.description.abstractKey performance indicators (KPI) are tools for measuring the progress of a business towards its goals. Although wind energy is now a mature technology, there is a lack of well-defined best practices to asses the performance of a wind farm (WF) during the operation and maintenance (O&M) phase; processes and tools of asset management, such as KPIs, are not yet well-established. This paper presents a review of the major existing indicators used in the O&M of wind farms (WFs), as such information is not available in the literature so far. The different stakeholders involved in the O&M phase are identified and analysed together with their interests, grouped into five categories. A suggestion is made for the properties that KPIs should exhibit. For each category, major indicators that are currently in use are reviewed, discussed and verified against the properties defined. Finally, we propose a list of suitable KPIs that will allow stakeholders to have a better knowledge of an operating asset and make informed decisions. It is concluded that more detailed studies of specific KPIs and the issues of their implementation are probably needed.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleKey performance indicators for wind farm operation and maintenancenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber559-570nb_NO
dc.source.volume137nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergy Procedianb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.385
dc.identifier.cristin1529549
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/642108nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,91,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg- og miljøteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal