Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNåvik, Petter Røe
dc.contributor.authorRønnquist, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T07:59:29Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T07:59:29Z
dc.date.created2017-10-24T12:20:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationProcedia Engineering. 2017, 199 2567-2572.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2462265
dc.description.abstractThe pantograph-catenary interaction is crucial for running trains on electrical railway lines. The coupled dynamic problem of an in space stationary system, the catenary system, and a system in motion, the pantograph, is dependent on the behaviour of both combined as well as individually. Different catenary systems exhibit different behaviour. This paper evaluates a catenary system upgrade by dynamic assessment. Existing railway catenary sections are upgraded or replaced due to wear, but also due to an aim for improved running quality or increased speed on the rail line. Field measurements were conducted on an old catenary section. This section was then upgraded, and some months later measurements were conducted on the new catenary section. Thus, field measurements were sampled at the same location twice. Since the measurements were sampled only months apart and that all measurements are recording behaviour under regular train operation, the loading is assumed to be identical. Dynamic assessment of both sections has been done using power spectral densities and histograms. Important differences and similarities in their response can be seen. This study further increases the knowledge regarding the dynamic behaviour of railway catenary sections when evaluating the impact of the upgrades.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDynamic comparison of a railway catenary section upgrade by field measurement assessmentsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber2567-2572nb_NO
dc.source.volume199nb_NO
dc.source.journalProcedia Engineeringnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.332
dc.identifier.cristin1507189
dc.description.localcode© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,45,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for konstruksjonsteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal