Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPutta, Koteswara Rao
dc.contributor.authorSvendsen, Hallvard Fjøsne
dc.contributor.authorKnuutila, Hanna K
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-07T11:47:41Z
dc.date.available2017-08-07T11:47:41Z
dc.date.created2017-07-19T14:52:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationChemical Engineering Journal. 2017, 327 868-880.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1385-8947
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2450037
dc.description.abstractA two-dimensional discretized rate-based model was used for assessing the impact of correlations and/or models for VLE (thermodynamics), solubility (CO2 henry’s law constant), reaction rate kinetic models and diffusivity of CO2 in aqueous MEA solutions on the absorber model predictions for CO2 capture. Experimental data from four different set-ups covering a wide range of conditions were utilized for the assessment. Four different thermodynamic models and eight different Henry’s constant correlations/models including the Aspen Plus V8.6 e-NRTL-RK model was used in the study. Even though the individual sub-models, e.g. solubility, physical properties, were validated with independent experimental data, the use of a random selection of these models will give different predictions when used in a rate-based simulation. It was seen that using different Henry’s law constant correlations had a huge effect on model predictions. Seven different reaction rate kinetic models were used and it was found that no single kinetic model was able to predict the experimental data from all the sources better than the chosen base case kinetic model. It was also seen that transport property (CO2 diffusivity in MEA) correlations could have a large impact on the outcome of model predictions and correlations based on the N2O analogy were better than the ones based on a modified Stokes-Einstein correlation. As a special case, frequently used kinetic models were used with the thermodynamic model and transport properties taken from Aspen Plus V8.6. It was found that two of the kinetic models predicted the experimental data with acceptable accuracy.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCO2 absorption into loaded aqueous MEA solutions: Impact of different model parameter correlations and thermodynamic models on the absorption rate model predictionsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber868-880nb_NO
dc.source.volume327nb_NO
dc.source.journalChemical Engineering Journalnb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.134
dc.identifier.cristin1482615
dc.description.localcode© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 26 June 2019 due to copyright restrictionsnb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,66,30,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal