Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAustad, Bjarne
dc.contributor.authorHetlevik, Irene
dc.contributor.authorMjølstad, Bente Prytz
dc.contributor.authorHelvik, Anne-Sofie
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-29T10:45:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T10:27:33Z
dc.date.available2016-11-29T10:45:32Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T10:27:33Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBMC Family Practice 2016, 17(1)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2432133
dc.description.abstractBackground Clinical guidelines for single diseases often pose problems in general practice work with multimorbid patients. However, little research focuses on how general practice is affected by the demand to follow multiple guidelines. This study explored Norwegian general practitioners’ (GPs’) experiences with and reflections upon the consequences for general practice of applying multiple guidelines. Methods Qualitative focus group study carried out in Mid-Norway. The study involved a purposeful sample of 25 Norwegian GPs from four pre-existing groups. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using systematic text condensation, i.e. applying a phenomenological approach. Results The GPs’ responses clustered around two major topics: 1) Complications for the GPs of applying multiple guidelines; and, 2) Complications for their patients when GPs apply multiple guidelines. For the GPs, applying multiple guidelines created a highly problematic situation as they felt obliged to implement guidelines that were not suited to their patients: too often, the map and the terrain did not match. They also experienced greater insecurity regarding their own practice which, they admitted, resulted in an increased tendency to practice ‘defensive medicine’. For their patients, the GPs experienced that applying multiple guidelines increased the risk of polypharmacy, excessive non-pharmacological recommendations, a tendency toward medicalization and, for some, a reduction in quality of life. Conclusions The GPs experienced negative consequences when obliged to apply a variety of single disease guidelines to multimorbid patients, including increased risk of polypharmacy and overtreatment. We believe patient-centered care and the GPs’ courage to non-comply when necessary may aid in reducing these risks. Health care authorities and guideline developers need to be aware of the potential negative effects of applying a single disease focus in general practice, where multimorbidity is highly prevalent.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.subjectGeneral practitioners – Clinical practice guidelines – Guideline adherence – Multimorbidity – Overtreatment – Patient-centered care – Polypharmacy – Qualitative research – Focus groupsnb_NO
dc.titleApplying clinical guidelines in general practice: A qualitative study of potential complicationsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2016-11-29T10:45:32Z
dc.source.volume17nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Family Practicenb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12875-016-0490-3
dc.identifier.cristin1373468
dc.description.localcodeThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel