• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for ingeniørvitenskap (IV)
  • Institutt for energi og prosessteknikk
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for ingeniørvitenskap (IV)
  • Institutt for energi og prosessteknikk
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessment of pressure swing adsorption as CO2 capture technology in coal-fired power plants

Riboldi, Luca
Doctoral thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
Luca_Riboldi_PhD.pdf (4.455Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2396798
Date
2016
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for energi og prosessteknikk [2622]
Abstract
Coal-based power generation is responsible for a significant share of CO2 emissions on

a global scale. Technologies to drastically reduce coal carbon footprint are critical for

meeting mitigation targets. Absorption, whether chemical or physical depending on the

process framework, is commonly regarded as the most mature technology in this

context. Nevertheless, absorption suffers from some drawbacks, such as high energy

requirements and corrosion of process equipment. Adsorption is considered as a

promising alternative, with potential for reducing energy penalty, environmental impact

and cost of CO2 capture.

The main objective of this thesis is to assess the viability of a process relying on

adsorption, i.e. pressure swing adsorption (PSA), as CO2 capture technology in coalfired

power plants.

In order to get a comprehensive overview on the prospects of PSA, different cases were

considered. Post-combustion CO2 capture was studied by integrating a PSA unit into an

advanced supercritical pulverized coal (ASC) plant. Pre-combustion CO2 capture was

studied by integrating a PSA unit into an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)

plant. Proper designs for these process frameworks were defined, taking into account

characteristics, requirements and constraints of the systems. PSA is a discontinuous

process, made of different steps undergone by each column of a PSA train. A dynamic

model was built, based on material, energy and momentum balances. The developed

dynamic model was then linked to the steady-state model of the power plant, by

exploiting appropriate process scheduling and the cyclic steady state (CSS) condition of

the PSA process (a condition in which the process transient behavior becomes steady

throughout different cycles). The resulting composite model allowed performing

simulations and analyses on a system level.

The post-combustion case (ASC + PSA) showed competitive energy performance. The

net electric efficiency obtained was 34.8%, whereas the reference plant without CO2

capture had 45.1%. The CO2 capture requirement was also fulfilled with more than 90%

CO2 sequestrated. A comparison with chemical absorption - performing with 34.2% net

electric efficiency - confirmed the competitiveness of PSA. A serious issue ascertained

concerned the required footprint of the PSA unit. A first estimation suggested the

necessity of more than 260 adsorption columns for processing the entire flue gas

coming from the boiler. The feasibility of PSA in the post-combustion case appeared

less attractive because of the number of vessels needed.

The pre-combustion case (IGCC + PSA) returned good results for all the performance

indicators investigated. A comparison with physical absorption showed that PSA is

slightly outperformed in terms of energy efficiency (36.2% versus 37.1%, with the

reference plant without CO2 capture having 47.3%), CO2 recovery (86.1% versus 90.6%)

and footprint. However, the performance gap was evaluated to be rather small, thus

additional investigations were carried out in this process framework.

Improvements in the performance of the pre-combustion case were sought by

considering two domains, the process and the adsorbent material. Several possible

process configurations were analysed and a range of results obtained. Improved energy

performance could be obtained but to the detriment of the CO2 separation performance

and vice versa. Modifications in the adsorbent material properties (attempting to

simulate different adsorbents and/or advancements in the materials) showed a

significant influence not only on the gas separation process but on the whole plant

performance. The utilization of improved adsorbents demonstrated the capability to give

a substantial contribution to close the gap with absorption, though it may not be

sufficient. None of the cases studied succeeded to fully match absorption-based

performance both in terms of energy and CO2 capture efficiency. Further, an approach

to exploit possible synergies between the two studied domains and realize the full

potential of PSA in this framework was outlined. It consisted of tuning the material

properties according to a specific process configuration. The results achieved were

encouraging as net electric efficiencies up to 37.1% were obtained without drastic

decrease in the CO2 capture efficiency.

The knowledge developed in the pre-combustion process framework suggested a further

case which was believed interesting for PSA. An IGCC plant was defined coproducing

power and ultrapure H2 with CO2 capture. The system is of interest both because it

allows capturing CO2 and because differentiating the plant products can be

advantageous in terms of flexible operation. Two novel process configurations were

developed, entirely relying on PSA. The first consists of two consecutive PSA stages

(Two-train PSA), while the second configuration carries out both CO2 separation and H2

purification within a single PSA stage (One-train PSA). Both these configurations

succeeded to provide a varying power-to-hydrogen output ratio - the net power output

could be reduced from 346 MW to 300 MW by increasing the ultrapure H2 throughput -

with a constant coal feed to the gasifier and retaining plant efficiency on a good level.

The common process design for an IGCC coproduction layout encompasses absorption

for CO2 capture and PSA for H2 production. With regard to that, a comparative analysis

seems to confirm the expected advantages brought by the utilization of PSA as the only

gas separation technology. A higher integration level could be achieved, allowing

significant energy savings. The assessment of PSA in this framework was concluded to

be promising and worth further analyses.

Summing up, it was demonstrated that PSA can be successfully integrated in coal-fired

power plants as CO2 capture technology. However, the analyses carried out showed also

that PSA is generally outperformed by absorption in an overall evaluation taking into

account different performance indicators. Potentials and limits of the technology have

been highlighted and recommendations for optimizing the performance have been

outlined. The knowledge developed can be useful to address further work on PSA

technology, especially in those specific frameworks (e.g. coproduction of power and H2)

where PSA can reach competitiveness.
Has parts
Paper 1: Riboldi, Luca; Bolland, Olav. Evaluating Pressure Swing Adsorption as a CO2 separation technique in coal-fired power plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2015 ;Volum 39. s. 1-16 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.001

Paper 2: Riboldi, Luca; Bolland, Olav. Comprehensive analysis on the performance of an IGCC plant with a PSA process integrated for CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2015 ;Volum 43. s. 57-69 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.006

Paper 3: Riboldi, Luca; Bolland, Olav. Pressure swing adsorption for coproduction of power and ultrapure H2 in an IGCC plant with CO2 capture. International journal of hydrogen energy 2016 ;Volum 41.(25) s. 10646-10660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.089
Publisher
NTNU
Series
Doctoral thesis at NTNU;2016:150

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit