Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArpaia, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorBirch, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorChesson, Andrew
dc.contributor.authordu Jardin, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorGathmann, Achim
dc.contributor.authorGropp, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorHerman, Lieve
dc.contributor.authorHoen-Sorteberg, Hilde-Gunn
dc.contributor.authorJones, Huw
dc.contributor.authorKiss, József
dc.contributor.authorKleter, Gijs
dc.contributor.authorLøvik, Martinus
dc.contributor.authorMessean, Antoine
dc.contributor.authorNaegeli, Hanspeter
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Kåre Magne
dc.contributor.authorOvesna, Jaroslava
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Joe
dc.contributor.authorRostoks, Nils
dc.contributor.authorTebbe, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05T07:22:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T14:00:29Z
dc.date.available2015-03-05T07:22:56Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T14:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationEFSA Journal 2014, 12(7):3770nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1831-4732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2381874
dc.description.abstractCotton MON 15985 was developed by biolistic transformation of cotton MON 531 to express Cry2Ab2 and GUS in addition to the Cry1Ac and NPTII proteins. Cry proteins in MON 15985 confer resistance to major lepidopteran cotton pests, whereas the GUS and NPTII proteins were used as markers during product development. Molecular characterisation of MON 15985 did not give rise to safety issues. The EFSA GMO Panel could not conclude on the potential occurrence of unintended effects for agronomic and phenotypic characteristics owing to data limitations. Compositional data gave no indication of unintended effects for which further assessment was needed. The Panel concludes that cotton MON 15985, as described in these applications, is as safe and nutritious as its conventional counterpart and other non-genetically modified varieties, and considers it unlikely that the overall allergenicity of the whole plant is changed. Environmental risk assessment was restricted to the exposure through faecal material from animals fed with cotton products of MON 15985 and its accidental spillage. Following a weight of evidence approach and considering the poor ability of cotton to survive outside cultivated land, despite the agronomic and phenotypic data limitations, the Panel concludes that there is very low likelihood of any adverse environmental impacts. The aadA and oriV sequences in MON 15985 may facilitate the stabilisation of nptII through double homologous recombination. However, considering the limited presence of intact DNA from MON 15985 in feed and the limited occurrence of horizontal transfer of DNA from plant material to bacteria, the Panel concludes that it is highly unlikely that nptII from MON 15985 will be transferred to bacteria.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)nb_NO
dc.titleScientific Opinion on applications (EFSA-GMO-UK-2008-57 and EFSA-GMO-RX-MON15985) for the placing on the market of insect-resistant genetically modified cotton MON 15985 for food and feed uses, import and processing, and for the renewal of authorisation of existing products produced from cotton MON 15985, both under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsantonb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-03-05T07:22:56Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.volume12nb_NO
dc.source.journalEFSA Journalnb_NO
dc.source.issue7nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3770
dc.identifier.cristin1196028
dc.description.localcode© European Food Safety Authority, 2014.nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record