• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for ingeniørvitenskap (IV)
  • Institutt for geovitenskap og petroleum
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for ingeniørvitenskap (IV)
  • Institutt for geovitenskap og petroleum
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

An Experimental Investigation and Process Modeling of Multiphase Flow Through Multiple Restrictions

Campos, Sthener R. V.
Doctoral thesis
View/Open
Fulltext not available (Locked)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2373704
Date
2015
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for geovitenskap og petroleum [1852]
Abstract
A methodology for simultaneous estimation of multiphase flow rate and stream

composition has been developed to be applied in a multiple restriction assembly composed of

two orifice meters and a cage trim valve. These differential pressure elements are typical

instrument installed in the wellhead of production wells in Urucu field (Petrobras/Brazil). To

deliver composition and rates four steps were done: 1) a multi-rate well test - an experimental

procedure carried out in real operation conditions. 2) modeling of multiphase flow expansion

process through cage trim valves. 3) performance and validation of multiphase flow through

orifice plate meters by the use of homogeneous and slip models. 4) tuning and metering

procedures for coupling the valve and orifice plate models. The last investigation developed a

full field production optimization procedure honouring pressure and routing constraints to be

applied in multiple wells.

Essentially, the research performed in this thesis is an experimental work followed by

numerical modeling. Model errors and performance validation were calculated on the basis of

measured data from a multi-rate well test. This field scale experiment consisted in a

sequential step response test followed by a transient and a steady state period “a priori” to

each next step. Three wells named Well 1, Well 2 and Well 3 were single routed to a test

separator. Two types of well performance were investigated: 1) production with stream

composition variation caused by gas/water coning. 2) production with steady state

composition. Eight wellhead variables were monitored: two orifice plate differential

pressures, the differential pressure and temperature through the cage valve, the downstream

choke pressure, the wellhead pressure and temperature and the gathering system temperature.

The field scale experiments generated a database composed by 1781 test points, averaged in

30 minutes interval.

Multiphase flow expansion process through cage trim valve is discussed in chapter 2. It

represents an enabler investigation to the thesis main objective. A systematic error in the

downstream temperature was calculated up to 8% for isenthalpic flash (PS) and up to 14% for

isentropic flash (PH) through the cage trim valve. The maximum error corresponded to the

maximum pressure drop in the valve. Deviation from ideal process in cage trim valve was

quantified with an adiabatic efficiency term. This adiabatic efficiency correction works as a

tuning parameter updated periodically to be used in the metering model. The flash input

parameters influence in the adiabatic efficiency calculation was studied through a parametric

analysis. The parameters investigated were: the gas/oil ratio, the valve pressure drop, the

wellhead pressure and the water cut were. Among the conclusions, it has been found that

increase the gas/oil ratio and decrease the differential pressure in the valve influenced the

expansion process in opposite directions. The observation explains the difference in adiabatic

efficiency behavior for wells with composition variation compared with the ones with

constant composition.

The performance and validation of orifice plate meter to estimate oil, gas and water

flow rates is discussed in chapter 3. It represents an enabler investigation to the thesis main

objective developed in chapter 4. It has been concluded the model which honors the slip

between liquid and gas phase is more accurate to predict multiphase flow rate through orifice

plates. It was found a coefficient of variation for the root mean square error fewer than 4% for

the slip model and fewer than 10% for the homogenous model. So, it was decided to use an

equation that incorporates the slip between gas and liquid to calculate the discharge coefficient in the tuning model and to calculate the orifice plate differential pressure in

metering model.

The simultaneous rate and composition estimation strategy was designed with a periodic

tuning and metering procedures in chapter 4. Periodic tuning runs after every well test

performed in the field. The procedure calculates three calibration parameters: two orifice plate

discharge coefficients and the adiabatic efficiency related to fluid expansion process through

the cage trim valve. Multiphase flow rate and stream composition were calculated with a

mathematic optimization formulation which minimized the residual sum of squares error

between the calculated and the measured orifice plate differential pressure and the

downstream choke temperature. The objective function was solved with a mixed method

strategy composed by the box method and the sequential quadratic programming solvers.

Tuning and metering steps were implemented in a compositional process simulation

(Aspentech Hysys) with input data from the multi-rate experiment. Gas/liquid ratio (GLR)

calculation was privileged compared to the gas/oil ratio estimation running the metering

strategy for three unknowns (gas/water fractions and oil flow rate). When two unknowns were

defined (gas fraction and oil flow rate) the procedure estimated the gas/oil ratio more

accurately. One of optimization decision variables is the volumetric oil flow rate at standard

condition. Therefore, the global solution that minimizes the problem also delivers the phase

flow rates. Furthermore, once the composition is found, the flow rates can be calculated with

a single orifice plate as demonstrated in the results of chapter 3.
Publisher
NTNU
Series
Doctoral thesis at NTNU;2015:277

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit