Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKvam, Ann Kristin
dc.contributor.authorWisløff, Finn Georg B
dc.contributor.authorFayers, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-29T12:37:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-22T11:06:20Z
dc.date.available2015-09-29T12:37:00Z
dc.date.available2015-10-22T11:06:20Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes 2010, 8(79)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2357728
dc.description.abstractBackground: We previously reported that changes of 6-17 percent in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores are regarded important by patients with multiple myeloma and thus may be considered as Minimal Important Differences (MIDs). However, patients’ internal standard of measurement may have changed over time (response shift, RS). In the present work, we evaluated whether myeloma patients experience RS and if this could affect the MIDestimates. Methods: Between 2006 and 2008, 239 patients with multiple myeloma completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline (T1) and after three months (T2). At T2, patients were asked if they had noticed any change in the domains pain, fatigue, physical function and global quality of life. They were also asked to give a retrospective judgment of their baseline values on all the four domains. Results: We found clear evidence of RS in myeloma patients. However, there were differences in both magnitude and direction between patients who stated that they improved and those who deteriorated. Deteriorating patients retrospectively reported better health-related quality of life at T1 for the domains pain, fatigue and physical function. In these patients, MIDs adjusted for RS were observed to increase up to 12 percentage points. In contrast, for patients stating that they improved, we only found evidence of statistically significant RS in the domain global quality of life. Conclusions: MIDs estimated from pre-test/post-test data appeared to be robust against RS in patients reporting improvement over 3-months. This could indicate that RS has a minimal impact on the results in patients who respond to treatment, and that RS may not have an important impact on interpretation of changes reported in clinical trials where an improvement occurs. Although the effect sizes of the RSs were small, RS in deteriorating patients may have an important impact on the interpretation of changes reported in clinical trials.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922103/pdf/1477-7525-8-79.pdf
dc.titleMinimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myelomanb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-09-29T12:37:00Z
dc.source.volume8nb_NO
dc.source.journalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomesnb_NO
dc.source.issue79nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1477-7525-8-79
dc.identifier.cristin515816
dc.description.localcode© 2010 Kvam et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel