• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Quality of Life as reported by school children and their parents: a cross-sectional survey

Jozefiak, Thomas; Larsson, Bo Sture; Wichstrøm, Lars; Mattejat, Fritz; Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
View/Open
1477-7525-6-34.pdf (376.3Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2357634
Date
2008
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for nevromedisin og bevegelsesvitenskap [1768]
  • Institutt for psykologi [1593]
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [21936]
  • Regionalt kunnskapssenter for barn og unge - Psykisk helse og barnevern [149]
Original version
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2008, 6   10.1186/1477-7525-6-34
Abstract
Background: Comprehensive evidence exists regarding the discrepancy between children's reports and parents'

by proxy reports on emotional and behavioural problems. However, little is yet known about factors influencing

the extent to which child self- and parent by proxy reports differ in respect of child Quality of Life (QoL). The

aim of the study was to investigate the degree of discrepancy between child and parent by proxy reports as

measured by two different QoL instruments.

Methods: A representative Norwegian sample of 1997 school children aged 8–16 years, and their parents were

studied using the Inventory of Life Quality (ILC) and the 'Kinder Lebensqualität Fragebogen' (KINDL). Child and

parent reports were compared by t-test, and correlations were calculated by Pearson product moment

coefficient. Psychometric aspects were examined in regard to both translated QoL instruments (internal

consistency by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients).

Results: Parents evaluated the QoL of their children significantly more positively than did the children.

Correlations between mother-child and father-child reports were significant (p < 0.01) and similar but low to

moderate (r = 0.32; and r = 0.30, respectively, for the KINDL, and r = 0.30 and r = 0.26, respectively, for the

ILC). Mother and father reports correlated moderately highly (r = 0.54 and r = 0.61 for the KINDL and ILC,

respectively). No significant differences between correlations of mother-daughter/son and father-daughter/son

pairs in regard to reported child QoL were observed on either of the two instruments.

Conclusion: In the present general population sample, parents reported higher child QoL than did their children.

Concordance between child and parent by proxy report was low to moderate. The level of agreement between

mothers and fathers in regard to their child's QoL was moderate. No significant impact of parent and child gender

in regard to agreement in ratings of child QoL was found. Both the child and parent versions of the Norwegian

translations of the KINDL and ILC can be used in surveys of community populations, but in regard to the selfreport

of 9–10 years old children, only the KINDL total QoL scale or the ILC are recommended.
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit