Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStamnes, Arne Anderson
dc.contributor.authorCuenca Garcia, Maria Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGustavsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorHorsley, Tim
dc.contributor.authorJónasson, Ómar Valur
dc.contributor.authorKoivisto, Satu
dc.contributor.authorKristiansen, Søren Munch
dc.contributor.authorPerttola, Wesa
dc.contributor.authorSchneidhofer, Petra
dc.contributor.authorStott, David
dc.contributor.authorTonning, Christer
dc.contributor.authorTraustadottir, Ragnheidur
dc.contributor.authorTrinks, Immo
dc.contributor.authorViberg, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorWestergaard, Bengt
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T08:56:41Z
dc.date.available2024-07-16T08:56:41Z
dc.date.created2024-07-15T09:40:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-031-57900-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3141423
dc.description.abstractThis chapter provides an extensive overview of the use of geophysics in archaeological research and cultural heritage management in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. It discusses the current status, role and acceptance of geophysical methods in each country, and outlines the state-of-the-art based on a synthesis of existing knowledge and experience. The authors consider the past, present and future of archaeo-geophysics in the individual regions, taking into account the academic, curatorial and commercial aspects of their use. This, in turn, serves as the basis for a discussion of the reasons for the varying degrees of accep tance and integration of the methods in each country, and aid the distribution of knowledge and experience gained across Scandinavia and beyond. The practical experience, application and general acceptance are not similar in the different Scandinavian countries. There is a general lack of integrating geophysical (and by extension non-intrusive methods) within the archaeological practice and guidelines. The case studies presented here show a range of archaeological applications of geophysics in Scandinavia, demonstrating how geophysical methods should by no means be considered “new” or “untested”. While there is a need for targeted research, there has also been a challenge in disseminating the already generated knowledge and experiences to other actors within the archaeological community. Some of this can be explained by a lack of trained personnel, domestic competence and archaeological institutions undertaking research into the applicability of geophysical methods, and data-sharing and making reports accessible.en_US
dc.description.abstractA Review on the Development and Current Role of Ground-Based Geophysical Methods for Archaeological Prospection in Scandinaviaen_US
dc.description.abstractThis chapter provides an extensive overview of the use of geophysics in archaeological research and cultural heritage management in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. It discusses the current status, role and acceptance of geophysical methods in each country, and outlines the state-of-the-art based on a synthesis of existing knowledge and experience. The authors consider the past, present and future of archaeo-geophysics in the individual regions, taking into account the academic, curatorial and commercial aspects of their use. This, in turn, serves as the basis for a discussion of the reasons for the varying degrees of acceptance and integration of the methods in each country, and aid the distribution of knowledge and experience gained across Scandinavia and beyond. The practical experience, application and general acceptance are not similar in the different Scandinavian countries. There is a general lack of integrating geophysical (and by extension non-intrusive methods) within the archaeological practice and guidelines. The case studies presented here show a range of archaeological applications of geophysics in Scandinavia, demonstrating how geophysical methods should by no means be considered “new” or “untested”. While there is a need for targeted research, there has also been a challenge in disseminating the already generated knowledge and experiences to other actors within the archaeological community. Some of this can be explained by a lack of trained personnel, domestic competence and archaeological institutions undertaking research into the applicability of geophysical methods, and data-sharing and making reports accessible.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Archaeo-Geophysics. Integrated minimally invasive approaches using country-based examples
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-57900-4_6
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectArkeologisk geofysikken_US
dc.subjectArchaeological geophysicsen_US
dc.titleA Review on the Development and Current Role of Ground-Based Geophysical Methods for Archaeological Prospection in Scandinaviaen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Review on the Development and Current Role of Ground-Based Geophysical Methods for Archaeological Prospection in Scandinaviaen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Annen arkeologi: 099en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Other subjects within archaeology: 099en_US
dc.source.pagenumber141-184en_US
dc.identifier.cristin2282230
dc.relation.projectCOST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology): CA17131en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 325509en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal